Association between modic changes, disc degeneration, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch in a large population based cohort: the Wakayama spine study.
Association between modic changes, disc degeneration, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch in a large population based cohort: the Wakayama spine study.
复制标题
在基于大量人群的队列中,现代变化、椎间盘退变和骨盆入射角-腰椎前凸不匹配之间的关联:和歌山脊柱研究。
DOI:
10.1007/s00586-023-07702-8
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Yamada H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Teraguchi M;Hashizume H;Asai Y;Oka H;Nagata K;Ishimoto Y;Iwasaki H;Tsutsui S;Takami M;Tanaka S;Yoshida M;Yoshimura N;Yamada H.
PurposeSagittal plane alignment is crucial for treating spinal malalignment and low back pain. Pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI–LL) mismatch is commonly used to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with sagittal malalignment. The association between PI–LL mismatch and changes surrounding the intervertebral disc is very important to understand the compensatory mechanisms involved. This study aimed to examine the association between PI–LL mismatch and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes surrounding the intervertebral disc in a large population-based cohort.MethodsWe evaluated participants from the second Wakayama Spine Study, recruiting the general population aged 20 years or older, irrespective of sex, who were registered residents in one region in 2014. In total, 857 individuals underwent an MRI of the whole spine; however, 43 MRI results were not included due to incomplete or inadequate quality images. PI–LL mismatch was defined as > 11°. We compared the MRI changes, such as Modic change (MC), disc degeneration (DD), and high-intensity zones (HIZ), between PI–LL mismatch and non-PI–LL mismatch groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between the MRI changes and PI–LL mismatch with adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index in the lumbar region and at each level.ResultsA total of 795 participants (243 men, 552 women, mean age 63.5 ± 13.1 years old) were evaluated; 181 were included in the PI–LL mismatch group. MC and DD in the lumbar region were significantly higher in the PI–LL mismatch group. MC in the lumbar region was significantly associated with PI–LL mismatch (odds ratio (OR); 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.7). MC at each level was significantly associated with PI–LL mismatch (OR; 1.7–1.9, 95%CI 1.1–3.2), and DD at L1/2, L3/4, and L4/5 was associated with PI–LL mismatch (OR; 2.0- 2.4. 95%CI 1.2–3.9).ConclusionMC and DD were significantly associated with PI–LL mismatch. Therefore, profiling MC may be helpful in improving the targeted treatment of LBP associated with the adult spinal deformity.