Children's social and moral reasoning about exclusion
Children's social and moral reasoning about exclusion
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00470.x
复制
发表时间：
2007-02-01
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Killen, Melanie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Killen, Melanie
关于排斥的社会和道德推理的发展研究利用了社会领域理论，与全球阶段理论相反，调查儿童对基于性别和种族的同伴排斥的评价。社会领域模型假定，道德，社会习俗，和个人的推理共存于儿童的包容和排斥的评价，并给予这些形式的判断的优先级不同的儿童的年龄，上下文和目标的排斥。发展性群体间研究的结果反驳了儿童道德的一般阶段模型方法，并提供了有关偏见、偏见和排斥的群体间态度的发展起源和出现的经验数据。
Developmental research on social and moral reasoning about exclusion has utilized a social-domain theory, in contrast to a global stage theory, to investigate children's evaluations of gender- and race-based peer exclusion. The social-domain model postulates that moral, social-conventional, and personal reasoning coexist in children's evaluations of inclusion and exclusion, and that the priority given to these forms of judgments varies by the age of the child, the context, and the target of exclusion. Findings from developmental intergroup research studies disconfirm a general-stage-model approach to morality in the child, and provide empirical data on the developmental origins and emergence of intergroup attitudes regarding prejudice, bias, and exclusion.