Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization

Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
复制标题

生态系统服务民主化——在城市化进程中评估自然效益的激进方法

DOI:
10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Bunn, David N.
Bunn, David N.
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
McHale, Melissa R.;Beck, Scott M.;Pickett, Steward T. A.;Childers, Daniel L.;Cadenasso, Mary L.;Rivers, III, Louie;Swemmer, Louise;Ebersohn, Liesel;Twine, Wayne;Bunn, David N.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目标:(1)评估如何利用生态系统服务来加强或破坏因隔离和经济排斥而产生的规划和发展做法;(2)调查生态系统服务评估的现状,并综合文献中越来越多的关于更新生态系统服务分析的建议。利用南非Bushbuckridge地方自治市现有的生态系统服务分布图,我们考虑了评估生态系统服务的民主化过程将如何更细致地反映社会中的不同价值观,结果:我们提出了评估生态系统服务的干预措施,包括广泛的利益相关者的价值观,并导致社会和生态过程的实际量化。我们演示了如何操作一个多元化的生态系统服务评估框架。结论:一个民主化的方法,生态系统服务评估是一个重新设想的路径,以挽救一个实施不力的概念,设计和管理未来的社会生态系统,造福人民,支持生态系统的完整性。这是科学家谁做生态系统服务研究,以接受更复杂,多元化的框架,使合理和包容性的科学信息被用于决策的责任。
Objectives:(1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses.Methods:Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function.Results:We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments.Conclusion:A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity.  It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.
人类和大象是非洲大草原上树木倒塌的驱动力
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02549
发表时间: 2017
期刊: Ecography
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Penelope J. Mograbi;G. Asner;E. Witkowski;B. Erasmus;K. Wessels;R. Mathieu;N. Vaughn
通讯作者: N. Vaughn
南部非洲社区自然资源管理的概念演变和实践:过去、现在和未来
DOI: 10.1017/s0376892910000512
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
B. Child;G. Barnes
通讯作者: G. Barnes
重新审视薪柴的可持续性:将尺寸结构和重新发芽整合到空间真实的燃料棚模型中
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12713
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
W. Twine;R. Holdo
通讯作者: R. Holdo
浪漫、崇敬、研究、权利:撰写有关南非大象狩猎和管理的文章,约 1830 年代至 2008 年
DOI: 10.4102/koedoe.v52i1.880
发表时间: 2010
期刊: Koedoe
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
J. Carruthers
通讯作者: J. Carruthers
通过知识合作应对复杂性:将生态系统服务纳入减少灾害风险的主流
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414374112
发表时间: 2015
期刊: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
影响因子: --
作者:
B. Reyers;J. Nel;P. O’Farrell;N. Sitas;D. Nel
通讯作者: D. Nel