The appointment of medical treatment attorneys: some lessons from Australia.
The appointment of medical treatment attorneys: some lessons from Australia.
复制标题
医疗律师的任命:澳大利亚的一些教训。
DOI:
10.1093/medlaw/6.3.297
复制
发表时间:
1998
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Suzanne Woollard
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Suzanne Woollard
The Law Commission's various reports in recent years in relation to mentally incapacitated adults have highlighted the need for reform in this area of English law. 1 In particular, in relation to mentally incompetent adults and the provision of lawful medical treatment, the various procedures which operate at present are patently inadequate. Although the right of self-determination is acknowledged by the English common law in the context of health care decisions, 2 there is no statutory facility for an adult formally to appoint a medical treatment attorney to act after capacity is lost. The House of Lords' Select Committee on Medical Ethics has defined such a person as," someone who is appointed to make decisions on behalf of someone who is unable to make decisions for him or her self. A proxy decision maker may be nominated in advance by the patient while competent, or... may be appointed by the court". 3 The courts have confirmed that an adult with the necessary capacity may consent to or refuse medical treatment, even if this may shorten life4 and the right of refusal extends to a right to refuse future treatment by way of advance directive. An advance directive operates where the maker has the requisite capacity to refuse treatment; is not unduly influenced by a third party; and the directive is intended to and does cover the medical scenario which later arises.'In contrast to the English position, most Australian States have implemented legislation giving a person the right to appoint a medical treatment attorney. The majority of states take an approach which is