Raven Surgical Robot Training in Preparation for da Vinci® Use: A Randomized Prospective Trial

Raven Surgical Robot Training in Preparation for da Vinci® Use: A Randomized Prospective Trial
复制标题

Raven 手术机器人为达芬奇® 使用做准备的培训:随机前瞻性试验

DOI:
10.3233/978-1-61499-375-9-135
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Lendvay
T. Lendvay
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Deanna Glassman;Lee W. White;Andrew Lewis;H. King;Alicia Clarke;Thomas Glassman;B. Comstock;B. Hannaford;T. Lendvay

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

机器人辅助手术的快速采用挑战了由于对达芬奇机器人的访问限制而可以进行充分机器人训练的速度。30名医学生完成了一项随机对照试验,评估Raven机器人是否可以用作da芬奇机器人上腹腔镜手术(FLS)块转移任务基础的替代培训工具。两组,一组在da芬奇上训练,一组在Raven上训练,在da芬奇上测试标准FLS块转移任务。在机器人FLS块转移熟练度培训后,两组之间的路径长度(p=0.39)和运动评分经济性(p=0.06)之间没有统计学显著差异,但在da芬奇上接受培训的人确实具有更快的任务时间(p=0.01)。这些结果为在使用da芬奇手术系统执行类似任务之前使用Raven机器人进行培训的价值提供了证据。
The rapid adoption of robotic assisted surgery challenges the pace at which adequate robotic training can occur due to access limitations to the da Vinci robot. Thirty medical students completed a randomized controlled trial evaluating whether the Raven robot could be used as an alternative training tool for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) block transfer task on the da Vinci robot. Two groups, one trained on the da Vinci and one trained on the Raven, were tested on a criterion FLS block transfer task on the da Vinci. After robotic FLS block transfer proficiency training there was no statistically significant difference between path length (p=0.39) and economy of motion scores (p=0.06) between the two groups, but those trained on the da Vinci did have faster task times (p=0.01). These results provide evidence for the value of using the Raven robot for training prior to using the da Vinci surgical system for similar tasks.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.012
发表时间: 2013-06
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
Lendvay, Thomas S.;Brand, Timothy C.;White, Lee;Kowalewski, Timothy;Jonnadula, Saikiran;Mercer, Laina D.;Khorsand, Derek;Andros, Justin;Hannaford, Blake;Satava, Richard M.
通讯作者: Satava, Richard M.