Obligation, binding, debt and responsibility: provocations about temporality from two new sources
Obligation, binding, debt and responsibility: provocations about temporality from two new sources
复制标题
义务、约束力、债务和责任：两个新来源对时间性的挑衅
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00217.x
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
J. Guyer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Guyer
在思想中调和概念的弹性，在实践中调和概念的精确物质性，是生活和智力艺术中的一个普遍挑战，但它尤其渗透到人类学中，因为我们可以在世界上的每一个概念词汇、每一种语言和生活情境中工作。有些概念由于其理论中心地位而特别具有挑战性。“义务”就是这样一个术语。它涵盖了精确的关系品质以及地位的包容性和持久性义务（缅因州，1861年）。规则和制裁的力量得到了积极声音的补充：人们可以感到有义务，承担责任，将自己和他人定义为有义务，这种能力可以通过鼓励包容性而成为一种资产。然而，在分析和法律中，精确的解决方案需要智力和政治艺术。最近的两个学术丰碑，涵盖了整个世界和许多具体案例-理查德海兰关于比较法和历史法，
Mediating the elasticity of concepts in thought and their precise materiality in practice is a general challenge in life and in intellectual artisanship, but it particularly pervades anthropology, since, potentially, we can work in every conceptual vocabulary, in every language and life-situation in the world. Some concepts have proved particularly challenging because of their theoretical centrality.‘Obligation’has been one such term. It covers precise relational qualities as well as the encompassing and enduring duties of status (Maine 1861). The force of rules and sanctions is complemented by the active voice: one can feel obliged, assume responsibility, define oneself and others as duty-bound.Such capaciousness can be an asset, by encouraging inclusiveness. In analysis and in law, however, resolution to precision demands intellectual and political artisanship. Two recent monuments of scholarship, covering both the whole world and many specific cases–Richard Hyland on comparative and historical law with respect to