The commodity pattern of trade and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem in the presence of aggregate and commodity-specific factor-intensity reversals

The commodity pattern of trade and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem in the presence of aggregate and commodity-specific factor-intensity reversals
复制标题

存在总量和特定商品要素强度逆转的情况下的商品贸易模式和赫克歇尔-俄林定理

DOI:
10.1016/0022-1996(84)90012-6
复制
发表时间:
1984
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
A. Hillman
A. Hillman
中科院分区:
经济学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Fisher;A. Hillman

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在多商品双因素模型中,对HO定理对商品贸易模式预测的理论分析倾向于假设因素强度反转,但实证文献已经研究了个别商品技术之间的反转是否普遍存在,然后提出的证据与HO定理有关。由于该定理的要素强度反转的结果在(2 × 2 × 2)模型中得到了很好的定义,我们通过对单个商品技术的聚合建立了多商品模型的模拟(2 × 2 × 2)设置。商品特定技术中要素强度反转对总体技术反转行为和HO定理的影响进行了检验。特定商品的反转,如实证研究的焦点,被证明与该定理没有直接关系。
Theoretical analyses of the HO theorem's prediction of the commodity pattern of trade in the multicommodity two-factor model tend to assume away factor-intensity reversals, but the empirical literature has investigated whether reversals between individual goods' technologies are prevalent phenomena with the evidence then being presented as bearing upon the HO theorem. Since the consequence of a factor-intensity reversal for the theorem is well defined in the (2 × 2 × 2) model, we establish via aggregation over individual goods' technologies an analogue (2 × 2 × 2) setting for the multicommodity model. The implications of factor-intensity reversals in commodity-specific technologies for the reversal behavior of the aggregate technologies and for the HO theorem are examined. Commodity-specific reversals such as are the focus of the empirical studies are shown to have no direct bearing upon the theorem.