Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis: a response to Mulatti and Coltheart.
Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis: a response to Mulatti and Coltheart.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.008
复制
发表时间：
2012-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Navarrete E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mahon BZ;Garcea FE;Navarrete E
Mulatti和colheart（2011，本期）回顾并总结了图片-文字干扰范式的几个发现，作者认为这些发现挑战了反应排斥假说。然而，他们提出的反应排除假说并不是那个理论——它是由Mulatti和colheart提出的一种解释，认为在图片-单词范式中，目标命名延迟只受到排除干扰词过程的影响（不受其他因素影响）。我们认为Mulatti和colheart讨论中隐含的一些背景假设可能导致了这种错误归因。最后，我们报告了最初描述的一种效果的再现，它作为重申我们建议的要点和概述未来挑战的经验基础。
Mulatti and Coltheart (2011, this issue) review and summarize several findings from the picture-word interference paradigm that the authors argue challenge the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. However, the hypothesis they take to be the Response Exclusion Hypothesis is not that theory—it is an account developed by Mulatti and Coltheart that holds that target naming latencies in the picture-word paradigm are affected only by the process of excluding the distractor word (and by nothing else). We consider some of the background assumptions implicit in Mulatti and Coltheart’s discussion that may have led to this misattribution. Finally, we report a replication of an effect originally described by that serves as an empirical basis for reiterating the main points of our proposal and outlining the challenges that lie ahead.