Validity of assessments of youth access to tobacco: The familiarity effect

Validity of assessments of youth access to tobacco: The familiarity effect
复制标题

DOI:
10.2105/ajph.93.11.1883
复制
发表时间:
2003-11-01
影响因子:
12.7
通讯作者:
Klonoff, EA
Klonoff, EA
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Landrine, H;Klonoff, EA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目标。我们检查了标准遵从性协议及其作为年轻人获得烟草的衡量标准的有效性。在研究1中,青少年吸烟者报告在他们经常光顾的商店购买香烟。在研究2中,年轻人试图通过使用标准协议和熟悉协议购买香烟,在标准协议中,他们出现在商店购买香烟一次,在熟悉协议中,他们通过购买4次非烟草物品成为常客,然后在第五次访问期间要求香烟。向17岁的年轻人出售的《熟悉度方案》显著高于《标准方案》中的同一年龄组(分别为62.5%和6%)。标准协议与年轻人获得香烟的方式不匹配。在合规研究中,陌生青年的获得率较低,但在合规性研究之外,熟悉的年轻人获得率较高。
Objectives. We examined the standard compliance protocol and its validity as a measure of youth access to tobacco.Methods. In Study 1, youth smokers reported buying cigarettes in stores where they are regular customers. In Study 2, youths attempted to purchase cigarettes by using the Standard Protocol, in which they appeared at stores once for cigarettes, and by using the Familiarity Protocol, in which they were rendered regular customers by purchasing nontobacco items 4 times and then requested cigarettes during their fifth visit.Results. Sales to youths aged 17 years in the Familiarity Protocol were significantly higher than sales to the same age group in the Standard Protocols (62.5% vs. 6%, respectively).Conclusions. The Standard Protocol does not match how youths obtain cigarettes. Access is low for stranger youths within compliance studies, but access is high for familiar youths outside of compliance studies.