Phonation Contrasts across Languages

Phonation Contrasts across Languages
复制标题

不同语言的发音对比

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jianjing Kuang
Jianjing Kuang
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Keating;Christina M. Esposito;M. Garellek;S. Khan;Jianjing Kuang

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这项研究比较了古吉拉特语(情态与气息)、苗语(情态与气息对比)、马扎特克(情态与气息与吱吱)和彝语(紧张与松弛)四种语言的对比发音类型,在语言内部和语言之间进行了多项声学测量。对于古吉拉特语、苗族和彝语,两种电声门图(EGG)测量也进行了比较;接触商测量区分了所有三种语言的语言内发音类型。虽然有几种声学测量可以区分每种语言中的发音类型,但在所有四种语言中,只有H1*-H2*做到了这一点。然而,当每种语言内的发音类别在不同语言之间进行比较时,发现每种类别在多个声学指标上因语言而异,例如苗语中的气息与古吉拉特语中的气息不同。这一意想不到的结果表明,语言/说话者在语音质量上的差异大于发音类别的差异。这一建议在声学测量的多维尺度分析中得到了支持。事实证明,三维空间主要区分不同的语言,而不是语音。发音类别并没有像预期的那样在这个空间中跨语言形成集群,但它们确实沿着空间的第三个维度占据了不同的区域,这个维度与H1*-H2*特别相关。因此,H1*-H2*再次被视为衡量不同语言发音差异的最重要指标。版权信息:除非另有说明,否则保留所有权利。有关任何必要的权限,请与作者或原始出版商联系。EScholarship不是存放作品的版权所有者。了解更多有关http://www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse发音跨语言对比的信息P·基廷、C.埃斯波西托、M.Garellek、S.Khan、J.Kuang加州大学洛杉矶分校;麦卡莱斯特学院;布朗大学(keating@humnet.ucla.edu)
This study compared the contrastive phonation types of four languages—Gujarati (modal vs. breathy), Hmong (modal vs. breathy vs. creaky), Mazatec (modal vs. breathy vs. creaky), and Yi (tense vs. lax)—on several acoustic measures, within and across languages. For Gujarati, Hmong, and Yi, two electroglottographic (EGG) measures were also compared; a Contact Quotient measure distinguished the within-language phonation types in all three languages. While several acoustic measures distinguished phonation types within each language, only H1*-H2* did so in all four languages. However, when each within-language phonation category was then compared across languages, each category was found to differ from language to language on multiple acoustic measures, e.g. breathy in Hmong is distinct from breathy in Gujarati. This unexpected result suggests that language/speaker differences in voice quality are larger than phonation category differences. This suggestion finds support in a Multi-Dimensional Scaling analysis of the acoustic measures. A three-dimensional space turns out to mostly distinguish the languages, less so the phonations. The phonation categories do not form clusters in this space across languages as might have been expected, but they do occupy separate regions along the third dimension of the space, a dimension correlated especially with H1*-H2*. Thus H1*-H2* is again seen to be the most important measure of phonation contrasts across languages. Copyright Information: All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more at http://www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse Phonation Contrasts Across Languages P. Keating, C. Esposito, M. Garellek, S. Khan, J. Kuang UCLA; Macalester College; Brown University (keating@humnet.ucla.edu)
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3704.769
发表时间: 1994-08-01
期刊: JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子: --
作者:
HILLENBRAND, J;CLEVELAND, RA;ERICKSON, RL
通讯作者: ERICKSON, RL