Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research
Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00607.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-12-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Wilson, Roger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wright, David;Foster, Claire;Wilson, Roger
背景近年来，在英国，服务用户参与健康研究的设计和实施已经有了显着的发展。让服务使用者参与现在被视为所有形式的健康研究的良好研究实践的核心组成部分。鉴于用户在卫生研究中的重要作用，有必要制定指导方针，使他们有效参与。虽然目前正在制定指导方针，目前还没有一个标准来评估用户参与已发表的研究和基金申请。目的本研究为评估用户参与已发表的论文和基金申请的质量和影响提供了指南。方法在现有文献和经验的基础上，制定了用户参与的评估指南，这些文献和经验涉及癌症患者和护理人员，研究的设计和进行。结果九个评价标准已经制定。标准包括诸如"是否清楚地证明了让用户参与的理由？用户参与的程度是否合适？"招聘策略是否合适？以及"培训的性质是否合适？结论：如果要理解用户参与议程在健康研究中的影响，则生成和应用指南至关重要。
Background The involvement of service users in the design and conduct of health research has developed significantly in the UK in recent years. Involving service users is now seen as a core component of good research practice for all forms of health research. Given the important role that users have in health research, it is necessary to develop guidelines for their effective involvement. Whilst guidelines are currently being formulated, there remain no criteria with which to assess user involvement in published studies and funding applications.Objective This study offers guidelines for appraising the quality and impact of user involvement in published papers and grant applications.Methods Appraisal guidelines for user involvement have been developed on the basis of available literature and experiences from studies involving cancer patients and carers in the design and conduct of research.Findings Nine appraisal criteria have been developed. Criteria include issues such as 'Is the rationale for involving users clearly demonstrated?, 'Is the level of user involvement appropriate?, 'Is the recruitment strategy appropriate?, and 'Is the nature of training appropriate?'Conclusion Generating and applying guidelines is vital if the impact of user involvement agenda in health research is to be understood.