Transforming Traditional Agriculture
Transforming Traditional Agriculture
复制标题
DOI：
10.2307/1055571
复制
发表时间：
1964
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Schultz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Schultz
关于西奥多W.舒尔茨关于传统农业转型的理论的争论，11年前就出现在《欧洲公共政策周刊》上，但并没有延伸到追溯舒尔茨错误的根源。事实上，舒尔茨对传统农业的描述本身就是错误的，因为在舒尔茨所说的雇佣劳动的某种生产方式背后有一个隐含的假设。舒尔茨这样含蓄地将一种虚假的普遍性归因于资本主义农业，是对不发达国家农业现实的盲目，也没有考虑到像美国这样最发达的资本主义国家农民农业和家庭农业的持续存在。
.The debate on Theodore W Schultz's theories about transformation of traditional agriculture, which appeared in the pages of EPW more than eleven years ago, did not extend to tracing the Schultzian errors to their source. In fact, Schultz's characterisation of traditional agriculture was itself erroneous because there was an implicit assumption behind all that Schultz said of a certain mode of production cultivation with hired labour. In thus implicitly attributing a spurious universality to capitalist farming, Schultz was being blind to agricultural reality in underdeveloped countries, besides failing to take into account the persistence of peasant farming and family farming in the most advanced capitalist countries like the United States.