Monitoring flexicurity policies in Europe from three different viewpoints

Monitoring flexicurity policies in Europe from three different viewpoints
复制标题

从三个不同的角度监控欧洲的弹性保障政策

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Tangian
A. Tangian
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Tangian

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

灵活保障的概念促进了劳动力市场放松管制(=灵活化)的补偿思想,在就业和社会保障方面具有优势。为了监测欧洲灵活安全政策的效果,构建了灵活安全指标。本文从新自由主义的视角、工会主义的观点和欧洲福利国家的概念分析了欧洲的弹性保障政策。实证调查表明,与政治承诺和理论考虑相反,欧洲劳动力市场的放松管制绝对占主导地位。为了克服这一政策矛盾,提出了所谓的弹性保险,即雇主对社会保障的缴款应与合同的灵活性/失业风险成比例。
The notion of flexicurity promotes the idea of compensation of labour market deregulation (= flexibilization) with advantages in employment and social security. To monitor effects of flexicurity policies in Europe, flexicurity indicators are constructed. The European flexicurity polices are analyzed in the neo-liberal perspective, from the trade-unionist viewpoint, and within the conception of European welfare state. The empirical investigation shows that, contrary to political promises and theoretical considerations, the deregulation of European labour markets is absolutely predominating. To surmount this policy contradiction, a so called flexinsurance is proposed, meaning that the employer's contribution to social security should be proportional to the flexibility of the contract/risk of becoming unemployed.
社会保障,2005年修订版
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Maya;Yoshio et al.(eds.)
通讯作者: Yoshio et al.(eds.)