Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.

Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
复制标题

病理语音质量的差异化感知评估:可靠性以及与声学测量的相关性。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Millet
B. Millet
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Dejonckere;M. Remacle;E. Fresnel;V. Woisard;L. Crevier;B. Millet

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

感知GRBAS量表异常语音质量(完成了一个“I”参数:不稳定性=波动的语音质量随着时间的推移)进行了测试,在5个不同的机构对943名语音患者。每个声音由2名专业人士单独评估。评分者间的相关系数分别为G(等级)0.87、R(粗糙度)0.70、B(呼吸困难)0.69和A/S(虚弱/紧张)0.65。使用量表的经验显著提高了评分者间的一致性。评价者内相关性(80个声音;时间间隔2-6个月)系统地略强于评价者间相关性。此外,GIRBAS/声学相关性进行了研究80病理的声音,通过使用多维语音程序(MDVP)的凯。主成分分析允许减少21个MDVP参数的5个临床相关方面,与他们每个人的典型声学测量。在G和Shimmer/Noise与谐波比、R和Jitter以及B和Shimmer之间发现最强的相关性。由于震颤和复音很容易在感知和声学上识别,因此将这些信息分别添加到AS和R中似乎是有用的。GIRBAS量表似乎是临床实践的一个有价值的工具。
The perceptual GRBAS scale for deviant voice quality (completed with a "I" parameter: Instability = fluctuation of voice quality over time) was tested in 5 different institutes on 943 voice patients. Each voice was evaluated separately by 2 professionals. The interrater correlation reaches 0.87 for G (grade), 0.70 for R (roughness), 0.69 for B (breathiness) and 0.65 for A/S (asthenicity/strain). Experience with the scale significantly improves the interrater agreement. The intrarater correlation (80 voices; time interval 2-6 months) is systematically slightly stronger than the interrater correlation. Further, GIRBAS/acoustical correlations were investigated on 80 pathological voices, by using the Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP) of Kay. Principal component analysis allows reduction of 21 MDVP parameters to 5 clinically relevant aspects, with a typical acoustical measurement for each of them. The strongest correlations are found between G and Shimmer/Noise to harmonics ratio, R and Jitter, and B and Shimmer. As tremor and diplophonia are easily identified perceptually and acoustically, it seems useful to add this information respectively to AS and R. The GIRBAS scale seems to be a valuable instrument for clinical practice.