Risks of immunotherapy with insect venom.
Risks of immunotherapy with insect venom.
复制标题
昆虫毒液免疫治疗的风险。
DOI：
10.1056/nejm197903083001016
复制
发表时间：
1979
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Grant
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Grant
致编辑：Hunt等人的研究1应该解决昆虫过敏症患者的适当管理问题。通过使用单盲方案、故意的昆虫叮咬攻击和IgG阻断抗体反应的监测，作者明确证明了毒液囊提取物优于全身提取物的有效性。这项研究分析了对蜜蜂和黄夹克叮咬有过敏反应的患者，而美国南部地区的罪魁祸首是polistes属的纸巢黄蜂。2在一小群患者中，我们已经证明了polistes毒液在诊断中也是有效的。文章不包括少于400字的摘录。
To the Editor: The study by Hunt et al. 1 should settle the question of the proper management of patients with insect hypersensitivity. By the use of a single-blind protocol, intentional insect-sting challenge and monitoring of IgG blocking antibody response, the authors unequivocally demonstrate the effectiveness of venom-sac extracts over whole-body extracts. This study analyzed patients with allergic reactions to honeybee and yellow-jacket stings, whereas the principal culprit in regions of the southern United States is the paper nest wasp of the genus polistes. 2 In a small group of patients, we have shown that polistes venom is also effective in diagnosing. No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.