Comparison of control schemes for a fuel cell hybrid tramway integrating two dc/dc converters
Comparison of control schemes for a fuel cell hybrid tramway integrating two dc/dc converters
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.132
复制
发表时间：
2010-06
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
L. Fernández;P. García;C. Garcia;J. P. Torreglosa;F. Jurado
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Fernández;P. García;C. Garcia;J. P. Torreglosa;F. Jurado
本文描述了由聚合物电解质膜（PEM）燃料电池（FC）和镍氢电池供电的混合动力有轨电车能量管理系统的两种控制方案的比较研究。该混合动力系统专为 400kW 的实际地面有轨电车而设计。它由具有单向 DC/DC 升压转换器（FC 转换器）的 PEM FC 系统和具有双向 DC/DC 转换器（电池转换器）的可充电镍氢电池组成，两者均耦合到牵引直流母线。 PEM FC 和 Ni-MH 电池模型是采用商用组件设计的。两种控制架构的功能是有效分配电源的功率。其中一种控制架构是基于八种状态的状态机控制策略。另一种是级联控制策略，用于验证所获得的结果。有轨电车真实行驶周期的仿真结果反映了本研究中控制系统的最佳性能。
This paper describes a comparative study of two control schemes for the energy management system of a hybrid tramway powered by a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell (FC) and an Ni-MH battery. The hybrid system was designed for a real surface tramway of 400kW. It is composed of a PEM FC system with a unidirectional dc/dc boost converter (FC converter) and a rechargeable Ni-MH battery with a bidirectional dc/dc converter (battery converter), both of which are coupled to a traction dc bus. The PEM FC and Ni-MH battery models were designed from commercially available components. The function of the two control architectures was to effectively distribute the power of the electrical sources. One of these control architectures was a state machine control strategy, based on eight states. The other was a cascade control strategy which was used to validate the results obtained. The simulation results for the real driving cycle of the tramway reflected the optimal performance of the control systems compared in this study.