Social Reward Questionnaire-Adolescent Version and its association with callous-unemotional traits.

Social Reward Questionnaire-Adolescent Version and its association with callous-unemotional traits.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1098/rsos.160991
复制
发表时间:
2017-04
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Viding E
Viding E
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Foulkes L;Neumann CS;Roberts R;McCrory E;Viding E

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在青春期,社会交往是一种强有力的奖励来源。然而,没有衡量这个年龄段的社会奖励价值的标准。在这项研究中,我们改编了成人社会奖励问卷,这是我们之前开发和验证的,用于青少年。年龄在11-16岁的参与者(n = 568; 50%为男性)完成了社会奖励问卷-青少年版(SRQ-A),同时还完成了人格特征的测量-五因素模型(FFM)和冷酷无情(CU)特征-以构建效度为目的。验证性因子分析支持五因子结构(比较拟合指数= 0.90,近似均方根误差= 0.07),相当于5个问卷量表:欣赏享受、消极社会效能、被动性、亲社会互动和社会性。与FFM和CU特征的关联与成人样本的结果一致,为SRQ-A亚量表在青少年中的意义提供了支持。特别是,具有高水平CU特征的青少年表现出一种“颠倒”的社会奖励模式,在这种模式下,残忍是令人愉快的,而善良则不是。性别不变性也得到了评估和部分支持。SRQ-A是衡量青少年社会奖励个体差异的有效、可靠的方法。
During adolescence, social interactions are a potent source of reward. However, no measure of social reward value exists for this age group. In this study, we adapted the adult Social Reward Questionnaire, which we had previously developed and validated, for use with adolescents. Participants aged 11–16 (n = 568; 50% male) completed the Social Reward Questionnaire—Adolescent Version (SRQ-A), alongside measures of personality traits—five-factor model (FFM) and callous–unemotional (CU) traits—for construct validity purposes. A confirmatory factor analysis of the SRQ-A supported a five-factor structure (Comparative Fit Index = 0.90; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.07), equating to five questionnaire subscales: enjoyment of Admiration, Negative Social Potency, Passivity, Prosocial Interactions and Sociability. Associations with FFM and CU traits were in line with what is seen for adult samples, providing support for the meaning of SRQ-A subscales in adolescents. In particular, adolescents with high levels of CU traits showed an ‘inverted’ pattern of social reward, in which being cruel is enjoyable and being kind is not. Gender invariance was also assessed and was partially supported. The SRQ-A is a valid, reliable measure of individual differences in social reward in adolescents.