Implementing Social Europe in Times of Crises: Re-established Boundaries of Welfare?
Implementing Social Europe in Times of Crises: Re-established Boundaries of Welfare?
复制标题
在危机时期实施社会欧洲：重新确立福利边界？
DOI：
10.1080/01402382.2014.919773
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
H. Vollaard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Martinsen;H. Vollaard
本书探讨了社会欧洲的状态时，欧盟的原则和政策必须在成员国实施，而欧盟的合法性危机和大衰退盛行。该卷探讨了各种社会政策的执行过程、阶段和主题，以确定不同的体制动态和行为体行为。个人的贡献检查换位的病人的权利指令，养老金改革的欧洲化;国家议会在换位的社会欧洲的作用;司法欧洲化;和欧盟决定的多层次执行。从理论上讲，该卷强调，实施往往是由国内政治的条件或作为一个“随机漫步”，由于组织和认知的限制。从经验上讲，该卷有三个主要发现。首先，欧盟的组成部分往往对欧盟的社会政策和国家福利制度产生矛盾的影响。其次，危机影响社会欧洲的实施，有时会导致基本原则和内容的修改，但不是全面的。第三，结果是，有证据表明欧洲化存在差异。
This volume examines the state of social Europe when European Union principles and policies have to be implemented in the member states while the EU legitimacy crisis and the Great Recession prevail. The volume explores diverse processes, stages and subjects of implementation in a variety of social policies to identify different institutional dynamics and actor behaviours at play. The individual contributions examine the transposition of the patients’ rights directive to the Europeanisation of pension reforms; the role of national parliaments in transposing social Europe; judicial Europeanisation; and the multi-level enforcement of EU decisions. Theoretically, the volume highlights that implementation is often conditioned by domestic politics or comes as a ‘random walk’ due to organisational and cognitive constraints. Empirically, the volume has three main findings. First, the constitutive components of the EU tend to have a contradictory impact on the EU’s social policies and the national welfare systems. Second, crises influence the implementation of social Europe, at times leading to a modification of fundamental principles and content, but not across the board. Third, as a result, there is evidence of differentiated Europeanisation.