Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology.
Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Wearden J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Droit-Volet S;Wearden J
本研究采用经验抽样方法，考察了年轻人和老年人在日常生活中时间判断和持续时间判断（dj）之间的关系。通过口头估计和间隔生产措施对dj进行评估。结果显示，年轻人和老年人对时间流逝速度的判断没有差异，这一结果与我们年龄越大，时间过得越快的传统观点相反。对时间流逝的判断与对持续时间的判断之间也没有显著的关系。此外，对时间流逝判断的个体差异的显著预测因子（情绪状态和对当前活动的注意力集中）并不是对持续时间判断的预测因子。总而言之，时间判断与dj无关。
This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments (DJs) in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method. The DJs were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passages of time judgments are not related to DJs.