Automation of boron chromatographic purification for d11 B analysis of coral aragonite.
Automation of boron chromatographic purification for d11 B analysis of coral aragonite.
复制标题
用于珊瑚霰石 d11 B 分析的硼色谱纯化自动化。
DOI:
10.1002/rcm.8762
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
De La Vega E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
De La Vega E
RationaleTo detect the small changes in past pH,the boron isotope ratio of coral carbonates, expressed as the δ11B value, needs to be both precise and accurate (2sd <<1‰). Boron measurements by Multi‐Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (MC‐ICPMS) require the boron to be carefully purified before analysis, which is time consuming, and requires specialist training. Here, we use the prepFAST‐MC method that enables the automatic extraction of B (up to 25 ng load) from a CaCO3matrix.MethodsSamples were purified using the prepFAST‐MC automated system with a ~25‐μL column of Amberlite IRA743 resin. Boron isotope measurements were performed by MC‐ICPMS. The effects of matrix load, speed of sample loading onto the column, and blank contamination were tested to evaluate the effects on the purification process. The optimised protocol was tested on various standards and samples of aragonite corals.ResultsThe blank contribution for the approach is ~60 pg and is negligible given our sample size (<0.2% sample size). Efficiency of matrix removal is demonstrated with the addition of up to 1.6 mg of dissolved low‐B calcium carbonate to NIST SRM 951 with no impact on the accuracy of δ11B values. The Japanese Geological Survey Porites reference material JCp‐1, boric acid standard NIST SRM 951, and seawater, all processed on the prepFAST‐MC system, give δ11B values within error of literature values (δ11BJCp‐1= 24.31 ± 0.20‰ (2sd,n= 20); δ11BNIST 951= −0.02 ± 0.15‰ (2sd,n= 13) and δ11BSeawater= 39.50 ± 0.06‰ (2sd,n= 2)). Results obtained from the coralSiderastrea sidereapurified with the prepFAST‐MC system show an average offset from the manual ion‐exchange protocols of Δδ11B = 0.01 ± 0.28‰ (2sd,n= 12).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates the capacity of the prepFAST‐MC method to generate accurate and reproducible δ11B values for a range of materials, without fractionation, with efficient matrix removal and with negligible blank contribution.