Efficacy of Interpretation Bias Modification in Depressed Adolescents and Young Adults
Efficacy of Interpretation Bias Modification in Depressed Adolescents and Young Adults
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10608-013-9578-4
复制
发表时间：
2014-04-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Hirshfeld-Becker, Dina R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Micco, Jamie A.;Henin, Aude;Hirshfeld-Becker, Dina R.
本研究评估了45名抑郁青少年和年轻人的四次认知偏差修正-解释程序的有效性（14-21岁; 12名男性，33名女性; Beck抑郁量表，第二版a千分之14）随机分配至主动干预条件（重复暴露于抑郁相关的模糊情景的积极结果; n = 23）或对照条件（n = 22）。两种情况在治疗后的解释偏倚测试中均出现降低，组间无显著差异。当仅限于那些在基线时有负偏倚的患者时，干预组在治疗中期和治疗后的解释偏倚方面表现出更大的改善。此外，在干预后和两周的随访中，干预组总体上在自我报告的负面认知方面比对照组有更大的改善。然而，在抑郁或焦虑症状的变化方面，两组之间没有差异。混合的结果的潜在因素进行了讨论。
This study evaluated the efficacy of a four-session Cognitive Bias Modification-Interpretation program for 45 depressed adolescents and young adults (14-21 years old; 12 males, 33 females; Beck Depressive Inventory, Second Edition a parts per thousand yen14) randomized to an active intervention condition (repeated exposure to positive outcomes of depression-relevant ambiguous scenarios; n = 23) or a control condition (n = 22). Both conditions experienced reductions on a Test of Interpretation Bias at post-treatment, with no significant between-group differences. When limited to those with negative bias at baseline, the intervention group showed greater improvement in interpretation bias at mid- and post-treatment. In addition, the intervention group overall had greater improvements in self-reported negative cognitions than the control group at post-intervention and two-week follow-up. However, there were no differences between groups in depression or anxiety symptom change. Potential factors contributing to mixed findings are discussed.