Transparency, Interrupted
Transparency, Interrupted
复制标题
透明、中断
DOI：
10.1177/0263276411423040
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Clare Birchall
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clare Birchall
尽管透明度的修辞并不新鲜，但在公共和政治生活中，透明度的修辞正在上升。它被认为是解决一系列社会、政治、金融和企业问题的答案。在一场“运动”的支持下，透明度已成为无懈可击的“善”。这篇文章提出的问题是，归因于透明度的价值是否会限制政治思维，尤其是对激进和社会主义左翼来说。如果我们注重保密而不是透明，我们可能会想到什么形式的政治、伦理、共同之处？
Though far from new, the rhetoric of transparency is on the ascent in public and political life. It is cited as the answer to a vast array of social, political, financial and corporate problems. With the backing of a ‘movement’, transparency has assumed the position of an unassailable ‘good’. This article asks whether the value ascribed to transparency limits political thinking, particularly for the radical and socialist Left. What forms of politics, ethics, of being-in-common, might it be possible to think if we pay attention to secrecy rather than transparency?