The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA
The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/hup.576
复制
发表时间：
2004-04-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Inada, T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Takahashi, N;Tomita, K;Inada, T
本研究使用本研究小组开发的MADRS结构化访谈指南（SIGMA）对MADRS日文版（MADRSJ）的评分者间信度进行了检验。两名或两名以上的精神科医生参加了与每个受试者的系统访谈，使用SIGMA独立评估MADRSJ。共进行了18次访谈7例DSM-IV型抑郁症患者。评分员评估的每个项目的严重程度范围为0 - 6（9个项目）和0 - 4（1个项目）。由两名经过培训的人员进行的单个项目的方差分析组内相关系数评分员间可靠性值范围为0.91至1.00，而由三名评分员实现的值范围为0.85至1.00。目前的研究结果表明，SIGMA是一个潜在的有用的访谈指南评估MADRSJ的10个症状，正是在抑郁症患者。版权所有（C）2004约翰威利父子有限公司。
The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of MADRS (MADRSJ) was examined using the structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA) developed by our group. Two or more psychiatrists attended the systematic interview sessions with each subject to evaluate MADRSJ independently, using SIGMA. A total of 18 interviews was carried out for seven patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder. The severity of each item assessed by the raters ranged from 0 to 6 for nine items and from 0 to 4 for one item. The analysis of variance intraclass correlation coefficient inter-rater reliability values for the individual items carried out by two trained personnel ranged from 0.91 to 1.00, while those achieved by three raters ranged from 0.85 to 1.00. The present results suggest that SIGMA is a potentially useful interview guide for assessing ten symptoms of MADRSJ precisely in patients with a depressive disorder. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.