Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices
Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199709/10)27:5
复制
发表时间：
1997-09
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
B. Verplanken;H. Aarts;A. V. Knippenberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Verplanken;H. Aarts;A. V. Knippenberg
三项研究探讨了习惯对有关出行方式选择的信息获取的作用。根据 Triandis（1980）的态度-行为关系模型，预计习惯强度会削弱选择过程的复杂性。这些研究侧重于选择过程的不同阶段，即情境线索的欣赏和选择选项信息的欣赏。与预期一致的是，与弱习惯参与者相比，那些有强烈选择特定出行方式习惯的参与者获得的信息较少，并且提供的选择策略也不那么详尽。人们试图通过操纵问责要求或注意力水平来打破习惯的影响。尽管问责制要求提高了信息获取的水平，但没有发现与习惯的相互作用。在一系列选择试验中，对选择过程的更多关注最初确实克服了习惯效应。然而，尽管进行了这种操纵，在后来的试验中还是出现了慢性习惯效应。结果表明，习惯可能对选择情境和选择选项的信息的欣赏产生深远的影响。 #1997 约翰·威利父子有限公司
Three studies examined the role of habit on information acquisition concerning travel mode choices. On the basis of Triandis’ (1980) model of attitude‐behaviour relations it was expected that habit strength attenuates the elaborateness of choice processes. The studies focused on different phases in the choice process, namely the appreciation of situational cues and appreciation of choice option information. In line with expectations, it was found that, compared to weak habit participants, those who had a strong habit towards choosing a particular travel mode acquired less information and gave evidence of less elaborate choice strategies. It was attempted to break effects of habit by manipulating either accountability demands or level of attention. Although accountability demands raised the level of information acquisition, no interactions with habit were found. Enhanced attention to the choice process initially did override habit effects in a series of choice trials. However, in spite of this manipulation, chronic habit effects emerged during later trials. The results demonstrate the profound effects that habit may have on the appreciation of information about choice situations and choice options. #1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.