Survival prolongation after treatment failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Trials JCOG9205 and JCOG9912

Survival prolongation after treatment failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Trials JCOG9205 and JCOG9912
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10120-013-0309-z
复制
发表时间:
2014-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Ohtsu, Atsushi
Ohtsu, Atsushi
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takashima, Atsuo;Boku, Narikazu;Ohtsu, Atsushi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

由日本临床肿瘤组进行的两项晚期胃癌一线化疗的随机III期试验(JCOG 9205和JCOG 9912)使用5-氟尿嘧啶连续输注(5-FUci)作为对照组。S-1、伊立替康和紫杉烷类)在20世纪90年代末JCOG 9205之后被引入作为二线化疗。该联合分析评估了JCOG 9912的5-FUci组中的患者在校正基线因素后是否表现出更好的生存率,并调查了生存期延长的原因。受试者是分配到5-FUci组的符合JCOG 9205和JCOG 9912合格标准的患者。采用考克斯比例风险模型校正基线特征后,比较总生存期(OS)、至治疗失败时间(TTF)和一线化疗治疗失败后生存期(OS-TTF)。二线化疗的细节也进行了审查。联合分析包括89和230例患者在JCOG 9205和JCOG 9912,分别。调整基线特征后,两组之间的TTF相似(HR 0.95; 95% CI,0.73-1.26)。然而,在JCOG 9912中,OS(HR,0.74; 95% CI,0.56-0.99)和OS-TTF(HR,0.76; 95% CI,0.57-1.01)均较长。与JCOG 9205相比,JCOG 9912中接受二线化疗(83 vs. 52%)和新药(77 vs. 10%)的患者更多。接受二线化疗的患者的OS-TTF显著延长(HR,0.66; 95% CI,0.46-0.95)JCOG 9912的OS和OS-TTF长于JCOG 9205。使用新药的二线化疗是观察到的生存期延长的潜在原因。
Two randomized phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (JCOG9205 and JCOG9912) conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group used 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (5-FUci) as the control arm. New active agents (e.g., S-1, irinotecan, and taxanes) were introduced as second-line chemotherapy in the late 1990s after JCOG9205. This combined analysis evaluated whether patients in the 5-FUci arm of JCOG9912 exhibited better survival after adjusting for baseline factors and also investigated the cause of survival prolongation.The subjects were patients assigned to the 5-FUci arms who met the eligibility criteria of both JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival after treatment failure in the first-line chemotherapy (OS-TTF) were compared after adjusting baseline characteristics using the Cox proportional hazard model. Second-line chemotherapy details were also reviewed.The combined analysis included 89 and 230 patients in JCOG9205 and JCOG9912, respectively. After adjusting baseline characteristics, TTF was similar between groups (HR 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.73-1.26). However, both OS (HR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.99) and OS-TTF (HR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.57-1.01) were longer in JCOG9912. More patients in JCOG9912 received second-line chemotherapy (83 vs. 52 %) with new drugs (77 vs. 10 %) than in JCOG9205. OS-TTF was substantially prolonged in patients who received second-line chemotherapy (HR, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.46-0.95).OS and OS-TTF were longer in JCOG9912 than JCOG9205. Second-line chemotherapy with new drugs is a potential reason for the observed prolongation of survival.