Self-Control, Negative Affect, and Young Driver Aggression
Self-Control, Negative Affect, and Young Driver Aggression
复制标题
自我控制、负面情绪和年轻驾驶员的攻击性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
T. Pratt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Steven J. Ellwanger;T. Pratt
大量的研究表明，阿格纽的一般应变理论（GST）和戈特弗雷德森和赫斯基的自我控制理论的支持，但这两个观点作出了决定性的不同预测之间的关系自我控制，负面影响（例如，愤怒）和犯罪/异常行为。GST规定了自我控制的间接和条件作用以及对犯罪/越轨行为的负面影响，自我控制理论指出，愤怒指标的独立影响是虚假的，应该在控制自我控制时消失。我们测试这些命题使用调查数据的概率样本的年轻人。结构方程模型表明，虽然愤怒在很大程度上是自我控制的结果，但自我控制和消极情感对驾驶攻击性有显著的直接影响。这些结果强调了需要整合GST和自我控制理论，以更好地解释这种形式的偏差行为。
A large body of research reveals support for Agnew’s general strain theory (GST) and Gottfredson and Hirschi’s self-control theory, yet the two perspectives make decidedly different predictions concerning the relationships between self-control, negative affect (e.g., anger), and criminal/deviant behavior. Where GST specifies indirect and conditioning effects of self-control and negative affect on criminal/deviant behavior, self-control theory states that the independent effect of indicators of anger would be spurious and should disappear on controlling for self-control. We test these propositions using survey data from a probability sample of young adults. The structural equation models indicate that, although anger is largely the consequence of self-control, self-control and negative affect exert significant direct effects on driving aggression. These results highlight the need to integrate GST and self-control theories to better explain this form of deviant behavior.