Policing Social Distancing: Gaining and Maintaining Compliance in the Age of Coronavirus
Policing Social Distancing: Gaining and Maintaining Compliance in the Age of Coronavirus
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/police/paaa029
复制
发表时间：
2020-12-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Grace, Sara
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grace, Sara
借鉴动机姿态理论（MPT）和程序正义理论（PJT），本文提出了如何最好地确保遵守社会距离法规的建议。应用这些理论，主要是观察数据的使用和影响的罚款通知的混乱，在警民相遇合作的影响进行了探讨。在关注英国数据/法规的同时，由于MPT和PJT都经过了国际测试，因此结论具有超越这些海岸的相关性。本文提出了第六种姿势强迫，一种抵抗服从的形式，以MPT提出的五种姿势。不仅要关注是否实现了遵约，而且要关注如何认识到仅通过胁迫或胁迫威胁实现遵约对未来合法性构成的风险。从研究中获得的经验教训适用于维持社会距离，关于：在互动过程中确保遵守，自我监管和执法行动，以及如何维护警察的合法性。
Drawing on motivational posturing theory (MPT) and procedural justice theory (PJT), this article makes recommendations for how best to secure compliance with social distancing regulations. Applying those theories to-mostly observational-data from a study on the use and impact of penalty notices for disorder, the influences on cooperation during police-citizen encounters are explored. Whilst focusing on the English data/regulations, as both MPT and PJT have been tested internationally, the conclusions have relevance beyond these shores. The article proposes a sixth posture-compulsion, a form of resistant compliance-to the five set out by MPT. Focusing attention not just on whether compliance is achieved but how recognizes the risk to future legitimacy posed by only achieving compliance through coercion or the threat thereof. Lessons from the research are applied to policing social distancing, with regards to: securing compliance during interactions, self-regulation and enforcement action, and how to preserve police legitimacy.