Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation.
Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s41073-018-0052-4
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Botos J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Botos J
协会进行了检查之间的作者报告使用的报告指南，以准备JNCI：国家癌症研究所（JNCI）的意见书，编辑的决定，并遵守报告指南和清晰度的审查评级。在提交时，作者被问到他们是否使用报告指南来准备他们的手稿，如果是，是哪一个。审评员对报告准则的遵守情况和报告的清晰度进行了评级。使用自定义的编辑经理企业分析报告收集数据，用于在2015年11月1日至2017年4月30日期间提交的首次或最终决策。将受益于报告准则的使用的人力资源类型也包括在内。所有评论均纳入分析。对每个答案（是，1;否，0）或评审员评分（不适用，0;一般，1;差，2;好，3;非常好，4;优秀，5）给出数值，并使用双侧t检验比较评分。在纳入分析的2209份提交材料中，1144份（51.8%）表示至少使用了一个报告指南。STROBE指南最常见（n = 531，24.0%）。在2068份（93.6%）被拒绝的提交资料中，1105份（50.1%）表示使用报告指南，963份（43.6%）未使用（拒绝与未拒绝的平均[SD]评分，0.53 [0.50] vs 0.49 [0.50]，P = 0.47）。在1033份报告指南依从性评级中，未被拒绝与被拒绝提交的平均（SD）评分为3.2（1.61）vs 2.9（1.57）（P = .005），使用与未使用报告指南的平均（SD）评分为3.1（1.48）vs 2.9（1.70）（P = .01）。在1036个表述清晰度评分中，未被拒绝与被拒绝提交的平均（SD）评分分别为3.6（1.00）与3.1（1.08）（P <0.001），而使用与未使用报告指南的平均（SD）评分分别为3.3（1.04）与3.3（1.10）（P = 0.64）。在这些JNCI提交的报告中，报告指南的使用与编辑决策或审查员对报告清晰度的评分无关。审稿人对遵守指南和表述清晰度的评分与同行评审后的编辑决策相关，对遵守指南的评分与报告使用指南相关。
Associations were examined between author-reported uses of reporting guidelines to prepare JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) submissions, editorial decisions, and reviewer ratings for adherence to reporting guidelines and clarity of presentation. At submission, authors were asked if they used reporting guidelines to prepare their manuscript and, if so, which one(s). Reviewers rated adherence to reporting guidelines and clarity of presentation. Data were gathered using a customized Editorial Manager Enterprise Analytics Report for submissions with first or final decisions that were submitted between November 1, 2015, and April 30, 2017. Manuscript types that would benefit from the use of reporting guidelines were included. All reviews were included in the analyses. Numerical values were given to each answer (yes, 1; no, 0) or reviewer rating (not applicable, 0; fair, 1; poor, 2; good, 3; very good, 4; and outstanding, 5), and scores were compared using two-sided t tests. Of 2209 submissions included in the analysis, 1144 (51.8%) indicated that at least one reporting guideline was used. The STROBE guidelines were the most common (n = 531, 24.0%). Of the 2068 (93.6%) submissions that were rejected, 1105 (50.1%) indicated using reporting guidelines and 963 (43.6%) did not (mean [SD] scores of rejected vs not rejected, 0.53 [0.50] vs 0.49 [0.50], P = .47). Of the 1033 ratings for adherence to reporting guidelines, mean (SD) scores for not rejected vs rejected submissions were 3.2 (1.61) vs 2.9 (1.57) (P = .005), and mean (SD) scores for reporting guidelines use vs no use were 3.1 (1.48) vs 2.9 (1.70) (P = .01). Of the 1036 ratings for clarity of presentation, mean (SD) scores for not rejected vs rejected submissions were 3.6 (1.00) vs 3.1 (1.08) (P < .001), whereas mean (SD) scores for reporting guidelines use vs no use were 3.3 (1.04) vs 3.3 (1.10) (P = .64). Among these JNCI submissions, reporting the use of reporting guidelines was not associated with editorial decisions or with reviewer ratings for clarity of presentation. Reviewer ratings for adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation were associated with editorial decisions after peer review, and ratings for adherence to guidelines were associated with reported use of reporting guidelines.