Neither Modularity nor Relational Contracting: Inter-Firm Collaboration in the New Economy
Neither Modularity nor Relational Contracting: Inter-Firm Collaboration in the New Economy
复制标题
既不是模块化也不是关系契约：新经济中的企业间协作
DOI：
10.1017/s1467222700013756
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
J. Zeitlin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Sabel;J. Zeitlin
在最近的一系列文章中，包括他们对这次研讨会的贡献，理查德N。Langlois和Naomi R. Lamoreaux，丹尼尔M. G. Raff和Peter Temin（以下简称LRT）对分散或垂直解体的后穆勒经济提出了有趣但矛盾的观点，他们试图从这个Vantage的角度重新概念化商业历史。从一个方向，不容易结合亚当·斯密的劳动分工与组织学习的想法，Langlois认为目前的情况是由生产的模块化。这种模块化及其促进的正常交易创造了一个让人想起南北战争前美国的世界，尽管今天的高吞吐量差异化交易所是由一套市场支持机构支撑的，特别是标准接口或设计规则。从一个面向奥利弗威廉姆森和协调成本最小化的方向出发，LRT相反地看到了一个合作者的世界，由长期的，主要是非正式的关系组成，这种关系既不是市场也不是等级制度。
In a series of recent essays, including their contributions to this symposium, Richard N. Langlois and Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Daniel M. G. Raff, and Peter Temin (hereafter LRT) present interesting but contradictory views of the decentralized or vertically disintegrated post-Chandlerian economy from whose vantage point they seek to reconceptualize business history. Starting from an orientation that uneasily combines Adam Smith’s ideas about the division of labor with organizational learning, Langlois sees the current situation as dominated by the modularization of production. This modularization and the arm’s-length transactions it facilitates create a world reminiscent of the antebellum United States, although today’s highthroughput differentiated exchanges are underpinned by a set of market-supporting institutions, notably standard interfaces or design rules. Starting from an orientation toward Oliver Williamson and the minimization of coordination costs, LRT in contrast see a world of collaborators joined by long-term, largely informal relations of a distinct type reducible neither to markets nor hierarchies.
世界各地的商业史
影响因子：
--
作者：
F. Amatori;Geoffrey Jones
通讯作者：
Geoffrey Jones