Development and validation of a mental health subscale from the Quality of Well-Being Self-Administered.
Development and validation of a mental health subscale from the Quality of Well-Being Self-Administered.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11136-012-0296-2
复制
发表时间：
2013-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ganiats TG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sarkin AJ;Groessl EJ;Carlson JA;Tally SR;Kaplan RM;Sieber WJ;Ganiats TG
本研究的目的是编制和验证自我管理幸福感质量的心理健康子量表(QWB-SA)。QWB-SA和其他测量，如心境状态档案(POMS)、医疗结果研究36项简表(SF-36)、欧洲问卷5D(EQ-5D)和健康效用指数标记2(HU)被用于三个样本：普通人群(N=3844)、非精神病组(N=)和精神病组(N=915)。使用代表心理健康结构的条目的独立专家评分以及心理测量学方法来开发和验证由10个条目组成的QWB-SA心理健康量表。心理健康量表具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach‘sα=0.827~0.842)，并与POMS量表(r=−0.77)、SF-36心理健康量表(r=0.72)、情商-5D心境量表(r=0.61)、回族情绪量表(r=0.59)等其他心理健康量表有较强的相关性。它与身体健康的衡量标准没有高度的相关性。在精神病人群中，新的精神健康量表与精神问题严重程度的指标有适度的相关性。现在可以在使用QWB-SA的研究中报告结果和与精神健康的关系。这一新的心理健康子量表也可以与之前使用QWB-SA收集的大量数据一起使用，以检查疾病和干预措施对与心理健康相关的生活质量的影响。
The purpose of this study was to create and validate a mental health subscale for the Quality of Well-Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA). The QWB-SA and other measures such as the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Medical Outcomes Study 36 Item Short Form (SF-36), EuroQOL 5D (EQ-5D), and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI) were administered to three samples: a general population (N = 3,844), a non-psychiatric medical population (N = 535), and a psychiatric population (N = 915). Independent expert ratings of which items represented the construct of mental health were used along with psychometric methods to develop and validate a 10-item QWB-SA mental health scale. The mental health scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.827–0.842) and strong correlations with other measures of mental health, such as the POMS (r = −0.77), mental health scale from the SF-36 (r = 0.72), EQ-5D mood item (r = 0.61), and HUI Emotion Scale (r = 0.59). It was not highly correlated with measures of physical health. Among the psychiatric population, the new mental health scale was moderately correlated with indicators of psychiatric problem severity. It is now possible to report outcomes and relationships with mental health in studies that use the QWB-SA. This new mental health subscale can also be used with the large volume of previously collected data using the QWB-SA to examine the impact of illnesses and interventions on mental health-related quality of life.