Roles of policy brokers in collaborative governance: Evidence from Khon Kaen and Bueng Kan cities in Thailand.
Roles of policy brokers in collaborative governance: Evidence from Khon Kaen and Bueng Kan cities in Thailand.
复制标题
政策经纪人在协作治理中的作用：来自泰国孔敬市和汶干市的证据。
DOI：
10.1111/aspp.12651
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Suriyanon and Yushi Inaba
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pholsim;Suriyanon and Yushi Inaba
本文考察了政策经纪人在泰国孔敬市和Bueng Kan市不同合作环境中的角色。它整合了倡导联盟和多个流框架，以查看不同协作环境中的政策经纪人如何通过基于嵌入式多案例研究方法的定性研究方法来管理其首选的城市交通倡议。结果显示，孔敬市显示了一个横向的地方合作环境，孔敬智库和孔敬交通系统是制定轻轨交通计划的关键政策经纪人。这些政策经纪人精通谈判、融资和地方联盟策略。Bueng Kan市展示了纵向合作，泰国内政部副部长是一个关键的政策经纪人，他拥有管理所需政策的潜在行政和政治权力。本研究表明，作为政策经纪人的支持资源，几个联合行动者对横向协作是必不可少的，但在垂直协作中，它们的重要性不如政策经纪人的资源。
This article examines the roles of policy brokers in different settings of collaboration in Khon Kaen and Bueng Kan Cities in Thailand. It integrates the advocacy coalition and multiple stream frameworks to view how a policy broker in different collaborative settings would manage their preferred urban transport initiatives by conducting qualitative research methodology based on an embedded multiple case study approach. The results showed Khon Kaen City revealed a horizontal setting of local collaboration where the Khon Kaen Think Tank and Khon Kaen Transit System were key policy brokers that strategized light rail transit initiatives. These policy brokers were proficient in negotiating, financing, and locally‐allied strategies. Bueng Kan City displayed a vertical collaboration where the Deputy Minister of Interior of Thailand was a crucial policy broker who held potential administrative and political powers to manage the desired policies. This study showed that several joint actors, as backing resources to policy brokers, were essential to horizontal collaboration, but they were less critical than the resources of the policy brokers in vertical collaboration.