The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension

The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/14766086.2016.1185292
复制
发表时间:
2016-06
期刊:
Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jeffery D. Houghton;Christopher P. Neck;Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar
Jeffery D. Houghton;Christopher P. Neck;Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jeffery D. Houghton;Christopher P. Neck;Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 在过去的二十年里,关于工作场所灵性概念的概念和实证研究显着增加和扩展。 Krishnakumar 和 Neck 早期发表的一篇颇具影响力的文章(2002 年,《管理心理学杂志》17 (3): 153-164)通过研究“什么”(工作场所灵性的多种观点的定义和含义)、“为什么”(鼓励成员对工作场所灵性的不同观点给组织带来的潜在好处)以及“如何”(鼓励灵性的方式),帮助为新兴的工作场所灵性领域提供了方向和结构。或在组织内实施。本文对 Krishnakumar 和 Neck (2002) 的“什么、为什么、如何”框架和“精神自由”模型进行了回顾性更新和扩展。更具体地说,本文回顾了过去十五年来工作场所灵性文献的发展和扩展,并考虑了许多当代领导方法的潜在贡献,包括自我领导、共享领导和真实领导对工作场所灵性的潜在贡献。本文最后探讨了工作场所灵性领域未来研究的关键方向。
ABSTRACT Over the past two decades, conceptual and empirical research on the concept of workplace spirituality has increased and expanded significantly. An early and influential article by Krishnakumar and Neck (2002, Journal of Managerial Psychology 17 (3): 153–164) helped provide direction and structure to the nascent field of workplace spirituality by examining the “what” – the definitions and meanings of multiple views of workplace spirituality, the “why” – the potential benefits for organizations from encouraging such differing views of workplace spirituality among their members, and the “how” – the ways in which spirituality may be encouraged or implemented within organizations. The current paper provides a retrospective update and extension of the Krishnakumar and Neck (2002) “what, why, and how” framework and “spiritual freedom” model. More specifically, the paper reviews the development and expansion of the workplace spirituality literature over the past decade and a half and considers the potential contributions of a number of contemporary leadership approaches including self-leadership, shared leadership, and authentic leadership to spirituality in the workplace. The paper concludes with an examination of key directions for future research in the workplace spirituality domain.