Cross-Cultural Differences in a Global “Survey of World Views”

Cross-Cultural Differences in a Global “Survey of World Views”
复制标题

全球“世界观调查”中的跨文化差异

DOI:
10.1177/0022022114551791
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Carlos Altschul
Carlos Altschul
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Saucier;J. Kenner;K. Iurino;Philippe Bou Malham;Zhuo Chen;A. Thalmayer;Markus Kemmelmeier;William Tov;R. Boutti;Henok Metaferia;Banu Çankaya;K. Mastor;Kung;Rongxian Wu;M. Maniruzzaman;Janvier Rugira;I. Tsaousis;Oleg Sosnyuk;J. Adhikary;K. Skrzypińska;Boonmee Poungpet;J. Maltby;M. G. Salanga;Adriana Racca;A. Oshio;Elsie Italia;A. Kovaleva;M. Nakatsugawa;F. Morales;V. M. Ruiz;Ricardo A. Braun Gutierrez;A. Sarkar;T. Deo;Lenah Sambu;Elizabeth Huisa Veria;Marília Ferreira Dela Coleta;S. Kiama;Soraj Hongladoram;R. Derry;H. Beltrán;T. Peng;Matthias Wilde;Frigiere Ananda;Sarmila Banerjee;Mahmut Bayazit;Serenity Joo;Hong Zhang;E. Orel;Boris Bizumic;Seraphine Shen;S. Watts;M. Pereira;Ernesto Gore;D. Wilson;D. Pope;B. Gutema;H. Henry;Jovi C. Dacanay;J. Dixon;N. Köbis;J. Luque;J. Hood;D. Chakravorty;Ananda M. Pal;L. Ong;A. Leung;Carlos Altschul

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们知道心理变量存在跨文化差异,例如个人主义/集体主义。但目前尚不清楚这些变量中哪些显示出相对最大的差异。《世界观点调查》项目的运作前提是,这些问题最好在代表世界人口大多数的不同抽样国家中解决,项目内容范围很广。数据是从占世界人口三分之二以上的33个国家的8 883名个人(根据当地宣传工作,几乎全部是大学生)在线收集的,使用的项目来自近50个变量的测量。此报告重点关注项目数据中最广泛的模式。最大的差异并不在于跨文化心理学中最常强调的内容(例如,价值观、社会公理、文化紧密性),而不是涉及宗教、常规规范行为、家庭角色和生活安排以及民族主义的内容。不经常跨文化研究的内容(例如,唯物主义,马基雅维利主义,主义维度,道德基础)表现出中等程度的差异。需要进一步的研究来完善这些结论,但有迹象表明,跨文化心理学可能会受益于在关注的心理变量方面撒下更广泛的网。
We know that there are cross-cultural differences in psychological variables, such as individualism/collectivism. But it has not been clear which of these variables show relatively the greatest differences. The Survey of World Views project operated from the premise that such issues are best addressed in a diverse sampling of countries representing a majority of the world’s population, with a very large range of item-content. Data were collected online from 8,883 individuals (almost entirely college students based on local publicizing efforts) in 33 countries that constitute more than two third of the world’s population, using items drawn from measures of nearly 50 variables. This report focuses on the broadest patterns evident in item data. The largest differences were not in those contents most frequently emphasized in cross-cultural psychology (e.g., values, social axioms, cultural tightness), but instead in contents involving religion, regularity-norm behaviors, family roles and living arrangements, and ethnonationalism. Content not often studied cross-culturally (e.g., materialism, Machiavellianism, isms dimensions, moral foundations) demonstrated moderate-magnitude differences. Further studies are needed to refine such conclusions, but indications are that cross-cultural psychology may benefit from casting a wider net in terms of the psychological variables of focus.
使用 Shedler-Westen 评估程序 (SWAP) 进行人格诊断:整合临床和统计测量和预测。
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.116.4.810
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Westen,Drew;Shedler,Jonathan
通讯作者: Shedler,Jonathan