Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach
Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11031-013-9385-y
复制
发表时间：
2014-06-01
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Goetz, Thomas;Frenzel, Anne C.;Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.
本研究调查了 Goetz 和 Frenzel (2006; doi:10.1026/0049-8637.38.4.149) 在四类概念模型中提出的不同类型的无聊。在这个模型中，根据效价和唤醒程度区分了四种类型的无聊：冷漠、校准、搜索和反应性无聊。在两项研究中（研究 1：大学生，N = 63，平均年龄 24.08 岁，66% 女性；研究 2：高中生，11 年级，N = 80，平均年龄 17.05 岁，58% 女性），通过经验采样方法（个人数字助理、随机信号）获得实时数据。使用多级潜在概况分析，针对效价和唤醒维度对无聊体验（研究 1/2 中的 N = 1,103/1,432）进行了分析。我们的结果支持所提出的无聊类型的内部有效性，与假设的四种无聊类型一致，但提出了额外的第五种类型，称为“冷漠无聊”。目前的研究结果进一步支持五种无聊类型的外部有效性，显示无聊类型与其他情感状态之间的差异关系以及情境发生的频率（成就背景与非成就背景）。讨论了方法学意义以及未来研究的方向。
The present study investigated different types of boredom as proposed in a four-categorical conceptual model by Goetz and Frenzel (2006; doi:10.1026/0049-8637.38.4.149). In this model, four types of boredom are differentiated based on degrees of valence and arousal: indifferent, calibrating, searching, and reactant boredom. In two studies (Study 1: university students, N = 63, mean age 24.08 years, 66 % female; Study 2: high school students, grade 11, N = 80, mean age 17.05 years, 58 % female), real-time data were obtained via the experience-sampling method (personal digital assistants, randomized signals). Boredom experiences (N = 1,103/1,432 in Studies 1/2) were analyzed with respect to the dimensions of valence and arousal using multilevel latent profile analyses. Supporting the internal validity of the proposed boredom types, our results are in line with the assumed four types of boredom but suggest an additional, fifth type, referred to as "apathetic boredom." The present findings further support the external validity of the five boredom types in showing differential relations between the boredom types and other affective states as well as frequency of situational occurrence (achievement contexts vs. non-achievement contexts). Methodological implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.