Update on the State of the Evidence for Stroke Family Caregiver and Dyad Interventions.
Update on the State of the Evidence for Stroke Family Caregiver and Dyad Interventions.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1161/strokeaha.117.016052
复制
发表时间：
2017-05
期刊：
影响因子：
8.3
通讯作者：
Miller ET
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bakas T;McCarthy M;Miller ET
方法使用以下纳入标准对已发表的中风家庭照顾者和二人干预研究进行批判性分析：（1）以英语撰写；（2）于2012年11月至2016年12月发表；（3）使用准实验或实验研究设计；（4）涉及中风照顾者或二人干预；（5）包括中风幸存者或家庭照顾者的结果； (6) 在中风护理连续过程的任何阶段实施。论文、书籍和会议记录被排除在外。与原始声明一样，4 我们使用关键词中风、家庭、护理人员、干预、实验研究和准实验研究搜索了 MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO。其他来源可从相关文章的参考列表中找到。我们使用 PRISMA 流程图（系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）跟踪搜索过程（图）。符合我们纳入标准的 5 篇文章被提取到仅在线数据补充中的表 II 和表 III 中。所有作者就文章纳入达成了共识。使用 CONSORT（报告试验综合标准）和 TREND 声明（非随机设计评估的透明报告）6、7 中的标准对这些研究进行批评，并评估其有效性威胁。 8 将研究结果与原始科学陈述中提出的建议进行了比较。 4
MethodsA critical analysis of published stroke family caregiver and dyad intervention studies was conducted using the following inclusion criteria:(1) written in the English language;(2) published from November 2012 through December 2016;(3) used a quasi-experimental or experimental research design;(4) involved a stroke caregiver or dyad intervention;(5) included stroke survivor or family caregiver outcomes; and (6) was implemented during any part of the stroke care continuum. Dissertations, books, and conference proceedings were excluded. As in the original statement, 4 we searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO using the keywords stroke, family, caregiver, interventions, experimental studies, and quasi-experimental studies. Additional sources were located from reference lists of relevant articles. We tracked the search process using a PRISMA flow diagram (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)(Figure). 5 Articles meeting our inclusion criteria were abstracted into Tables II and III in the online-only Data Supplement. Consensus was reached on article inclusion by all authors. The studies were critiqued using criteria from the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) and TREND statements (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs) 6, 7 and assessed for threats to validity. 8 Findings were compared with recommendations made in the original scientific statement. 4