Human epididymis protein 4 in endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis1

Human epididymis protein 4 in endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis1
复制标题

子宫内膜癌中的人附睾蛋白 4:荟萃分析1

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Liu S
Liu S
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li LM;Zhu YX;Zhong Y;Su T;Fan XM;Xi Q;Li MY;Fu J;Tan H;Liu S

文献摘要

相似文献

背景:血清人附睾蛋白4(HE 4)是子宫内膜癌(EC)的潜在标志物,但其对EC的诊断价值仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们进行了荟萃分析,以评估血清HE 4诊断EC的准确性。方法:利用在线数据库系统鉴定血清HE 4诊断EC准确性的文献报道。使用STATA 12.0、Meta-Disc 1.4和Review Manager 5.2进行荟萃分析。结果:共有4182名参与者和23项研究被纳入我们的荟萃分析。合并敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断比值比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)为0.65(95% CI:0.56-0.73),0.91(95% CI:0.84-0.95)、(95% CI:4.38-12.64)、0.38(95% CI:0.31-0.47)、19.46(95% CI:11.61-32.62)和0.84(95% CI:0.81 - 0.87)。我们的综合分析表明,HE 4是一个有用的诊断指标EC。亚组分析表明,良性疾病对照组的研究显示出比健康对照组更高的诊断准确性。结论:血清HE 4可作为诊断EC的潜在生物标志物。由于存在一定的局限性,这一结论应谨慎解释。
BACKGROUND:.Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a potential marker for endometrial cancer (EC), however, the diagnostic value of HE4 for EC remains controversial. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for EC...METHODS:.Literature reports of the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for EC were systematically identified using online data-bases. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 12.0, Meta-Disc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.2...RESULTS:.A total of 4182 participants and 23 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.73), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95), (95% CI: 4.38-12.64), 0.38 (95% CI: 0.31-0.47), 19.46 (95% CI: 11.61-32.62) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.87), respectively. Our overall analysis suggested that HE4 is a useful diagnostic marker for EC. Subgroup analysis indicated that studies with benign disease controls showed higher diagnostic accuracies than those with healthy controls...CONCLUSION:.Serum HE4 may serve as a potential biomarker for EC diagnosis. Due to certain limitations, this conclusion should to be cautiously interpreted.