Community-Sourced Intervention Programs: Review of Submissions in Response to a Statewide Call for "Promising Practices".
Community-Sourced Intervention Programs: Review of Submissions in Response to a Statewide Call for "Promising Practices".
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10488-015-0650-0
复制
发表时间：
2017-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D'Angelo G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lyon AR;Pullmann MD;Walker SC;D'Angelo G
发起这项研究是为了补充有关青少年心理健康、儿童福利和少年司法服务部门当地干预计划的新兴文献，其中许多项目展示了基于实践或社区定义的证据，但可能尚未经过实证评估。针对三项公开呼吁增加研究支持的干预计划清单而提交的申请的特点进行了审查，包括有效性证据、关键质量保证 (QA) 要素的使用（例如，明确规定的培训或完整性监控程序）和文化特异性。调查结果表明，大约一半的提交内容中确定了四个质量保证流程：特定的初始培训流程、干预完整性措施的存在、常规结果监控以及培训后的持续支持。在确定有更多研究证据证明其有效性的计划中，更常见的是初始培训过程和完整性测量。总体而言，文化元素的描述相对较少，并且最常反映表面的项目交付特征（例如，以英语以外的语言提供服务）。讨论的重点是提交的计划与侧重于实施科学和文化能力的大量文献的一致性。
This study was initiated to add to the nascent literature on locally-grown intervention programs in the youth mental health, child welfare, and juvenile justice service sectors, many of which demonstrate practice-based or community-defined evidence, but may not have been subjected to empirical evaluation. Characteristics of applications submitted in response to three public calls for additions to an inventory of research-supported intervention programs were reviewed on evidence for effectiveness, the use of key quality assurance (QA) elements (e.g., clearly specified training or integrity monitoring procedures), and cultural specificity. Findings indicate that four QA processes were identified in approximately half of all submissions: a specific initial training process, the existence of intervention integrity measures, routine outcome monitoring, and ongoing support post-training. An initial training process and integrity measurement were more commonly described among programs determined to have greater research evidence for their effectiveness. Overall, cultural elements were described relatively infrequently and most often reflected surface-level program delivery characteristics (e.g., offering services in languages other than English). Discussion is focused on the alignment of submitted programs with the larger literatures focused on implementation science and cultural competence.