SEX OF RESEARCHERS AND SEX-TYPED COMMUNICATIONS AS DETERMINANTS OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN INFLUENCEABILITY - A META-ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL-INFLUENCE STUDIES
SEX OF RESEARCHERS AND SEX-TYPED COMMUNICATIONS AS DETERMINANTS OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN INFLUENCEABILITY - A META-ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL-INFLUENCE STUDIES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.1
复制
发表时间：
1981-01-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
CARLI, LL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
EAGLY, AH;CARLI, LL
148项关于男性和女性在受影响程度上是否不同的研究的结果进行了荟萃分析。分析表明：(a)在群体压力情境下，女性比男性更容易被说服，也更容易顺从。在不涉及监视的情况下，女性也更顺从，但这种效应容易受到R. Rosenthal（1979）讨论的“文件抽屉”问题的影响。效应量估计表明，影响能力的性别差异通常很小。本文还描述了一项对83名男性和118名女性本科生的研究，该研究支持了研究人员的性别是性别差异的决定因素的假设。在影响力研究中，79%的作者是男性，男性在女性的说服力和从众性方面存在更大的性别差异。在由女性撰写的研究中，没有性别差异。（43 ref）（PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
The outcomes of 148 studies of whether men and women differ in how easily they are influenced are examined meta-analytically. The analysis indicates that (a) women are more persuasible and more conforming than men in group pressure situations that involve surveillance by the influencing agent. In situations not involving surveillance, women are also more conforming, but this effect is vulnerable to the" file-drawer" problem discussed by R. Rosenthal (1979). Effect-size estimates show that the sex difference in influenceability is generally small. The present article also describes a study with 83 male and 118 female undergraduates that supported the hypothesis that sex of researchers is a determinant of the sex difference. 79% of the authors of influenceability studies were male, and men obtained larger sex differences in the direction of greater persuasibility and conformity among women. In studies authored by women, there was no sex difference.(43 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)