Memory, amnesia, and the issue of recovered memory: neurobiological aspects.

Memory, amnesia, and the issue of recovered memory: neurobiological aspects.
复制标题

记忆、健忘症和恢复记忆的问题:神经生物学方面。

DOI:
10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00037-3
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
Clinical psychology review.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zola,SM
Zola,SM
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zola,SM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这篇文章的主要论点是,关于“恢复记忆”的可信性的争论——成年人对童年性虐待和创伤的恢复记忆的报告,据称被压抑了很多年——可以通过考虑关于记忆如何工作的生物学和行为学事实和观点而得到有用的信息。因此,本综述的第一部分描述了记忆和健忘症的神经生物学和神经心理学的最新事实和观点,包括大脑的哪些部分对记忆很重要,大脑中不同记忆系统之间的区别,以及婴儿健忘症和源性健忘症的现象。第二部分考虑了关于记忆的生物和行为基础的信息,并解决了关于记忆的两个问题,这两个问题已经成为恢复记忆争论的焦点,即创伤性事件的记忆是否会随着时间的推移而改变,以及是否可以为没有发生的创伤性事件创造记忆。
The main thesis of this article is that the debate about the credibility of “recovered memories”—reports by adults of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse and trauma that were allegedly repressed for many years—can be usefully informed by considering the biological and behavioral facts and ideas about how memory works. Accordingly, the first section of this review describes current facts and ideas about the neurobiology and neuropsychology of memory and amnesia, including what parts of the brain are important for memory, distinctions between different memory systems in the brain, and the phenomena of infantile amnesia and source amnesia. The second section takes into account the information about the biological and behavioral bases of memory and addresses two questions about memory that have become a focus of debate in the recovered memory controversy, that is, whether memories for traumatic events change over time, and whether memories can be created for traumatic events that did not actually happen.