Shared Reading: assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention.
Shared Reading: assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention.
复制标题
共享阅读：评估基于文献的健康干预措施的内在价值。
DOI：
10.1136/medhum-2015-010704
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Longden E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Longden E
公共卫生战略越来越重视促进福祉的社会心理和艺术战略。这项研究提出了一个具体的文学为基础的干预，共享阅读，它提供了一个以社区为基础的空间，个人可以与文学和彼此的初步调查结果。一个为期12周的交叉设计进行了16名参与者，比较利益与六个会议的共享阅读与比较社会活动，建筑环境研讨会。收集的数据包括心理健康的定量自我报告措施，以及会议记录和个人视频辅助访谈的成绩单分析。定性研究结果表明，与共享阅读相关的五个内在好处：活泼，创造性的口齿不清，情感，个人和团体（或集体身份建设）。定量数据还表明，干预与增强“生活目的”感有关。该研究的局限性包括样本量小和基线时普遍高水平的心理健康所产生的天花板效应。阅读团体的治疗潜力进行了讨论，包括艺术和健康干预措施的工具和内在价值之间的区别。
Public health strategies have placed increasing emphasis on psychosocial and arts-based strategies for promoting well-being. This study presents preliminary findings for a specific literary-based intervention, Shared Reading, which provides community-based spaces in which individuals can relate with both literature and one another. A 12-week crossover design was conducted with 16 participants to compare benefits associated with six sessions of Shared Reading versus a comparison social activity, Built Environment workshops. Data collected included quantitative self-report measures of psychological well-being, as well as transcript analysis of session recordings and individual video-assisted interviews. Qualitative findings indicated five intrinsic benefits associated with Shared Reading: liveness, creative inarticulacy, the emotional, the personal and the group (or collective identity construction). Quantitative data additionally showed that the intervention is associated with enhancement of a sense of ‘Purpose in Life’. Limitations of the study included the small sample size and ceiling effects created by generally high levels of psychological well-being at baseline. The therapeutic potential of reading groups is discussed, including the distinction between instrumental and intrinsic value within arts-and-health interventions.