Reversibility of reinforcement between eating and running by schedule changes: A comparison of hypotheses and models
Reversibility of reinforcement between eating and running by schedule changes: A comparison of hypotheses and models
复制标题
饮食和跑步之间的强化通过日程改变的可逆性：假设和模型的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1979
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Wozny
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Timberlake;M. Wozny
老鼠增加进食，从而获得跑轮，或增加跑步，获得食物，这取决于相对于基线，按照预定的反应比率，哪种反应可能被剥夺。在这两个时间表下，工具响应显着超过了时间表非偶然影响的适当基线。结果与强化是由两个反应之间的总体或瞬时概率差异产生的假设相矛盾。相反，他们支持将反应剥夺条件作为强化的关键决定因素。在最近几个预测时间表变化强化可逆性的定量模型中，只有相对反应剥夺模型的预测与任一时间表的数据没有显着差异。
Rats increased eating that produced access to a running-wheel or increased running that produced access to food, depending on which response was potentially deprived, relative to baseline, by the scheduled ratio of responding. Under both schedules, instrumental responding significantly exceeded appropriate baselines of the noncontingent effects of the schedule. The results contradicted the hypothesis that reinforcement is produced by an overall or momentary probability differential between two responses; instead, they supported the condition of response deprivation as a key determinant of reinforcement. Of several recent quantitative models that predict reversibility of reinforcement by schedule changes, only the predictions of the relative response-deprivation model did not differ significantly from the data of either schedule.