Lifestyle behaviors, obesity, and perceived health among men with and without a diagnosis of prostate cancer: A population-based, cross-sectional study
Lifestyle behaviors, obesity, and perceived health among men with and without a diagnosis of prostate cancer: A population-based, cross-sectional study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1471-2458-8-23
复制
发表时间：
2008-01-22
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Imeokparia, Remi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rogers, Laura Q.;Courneya, Kerry S.;Imeokparia, Remi
工作背景：更好地了解前列腺癌幸存者与非前列腺癌男性的差异以及这些潜在差异是否在人口统计学亚组中有所不同，将有助于关注和优先考虑未来的公共卫生干预措施，以改善前列腺癌幸存者的健康和福祉。因此，我们的研究目的是在全国范围内，以人群为基础的样本中，比较前列腺癌患者和非前列腺癌患者的生活方式、身体质量指数（BMI）和自觉健康状况，并探讨这些比较在人口统计学亚组中是否存在差异。方法：在一项横断面研究中，从行为风险因素监测系统（BRFSS）2002年的数据中确定了年龄≥ 40岁的男性（n = 63，662）。报告前列腺癌病史的受访者（n = 2，524）与非前列腺癌对照组（n = 61，138）在每日水果和蔬菜服务（FVPD），吸烟，饮酒，久坐行为，BMI和感知健康方面进行了比较。多变量logistic回归计算了整个样本和年龄、种族、教育和城市化亚组的调整优势比（OR）和95%置信区间（CI）。结果：前列腺癌男性与非前列腺癌男性在吸烟、饮酒、久坐行为和肥胖方面没有差异，但更有可能消耗>= 5 FVPD（OR，95% CI：1.30，1.09-1.56），报告健康状况较差或一般（OR，95% CI：1.62，1.33-1.97）。亚组分析表明，在农村受访者中，前列腺癌幸存者中>= 5 FVPD的较高可能性减弱（OR，95%CI：0.98，0.72-1.33）。在以下情况下，
Background: A better understanding of how prostate cancer survivors differ from men without prostate cancer and whether these potential differences vary across demographic subgroups will help to focus and prioritize future public health interventions for improving the health and well-being of prostate cancer survivors. Therefore, our study aims were to compare lifestyle behaviors, body mass index (BMI), and perceived health in men with and without a diagnosis of prostate cancer in a national, population-based sample and to explore whether these comparisons differ for demographic subgroups.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, men aged >= 40 were identified from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2002 data (n = 63,662). Respondents reporting history of prostate cancer (n = 2,524) were compared with non prostate cancer controls (n = 61,138) with regard to daily fruit and vegetable servings (FVPD), smoking, alcohol, sedentary behavior, BMI, and perceived health. Multivariable logistic regression calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the entire sample and for age, race, education, and urbanicity subgroups.Results: Men with prostate cancer did not differ from men without prostate cancer with regard to smoking, alcohol, sedentary behavior, and obesity but were more likely to consume >= 5 FVPD (OR, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.09-1.56) and report poor or fair health (OR, 95% CI: 1.62, 1.33-1.97). Subgroup analyses demonstrated attenuation of the higher likelihood of >= 5 FVPD among prostate cancer survivors in rural respondents (OR, 95% CI: 0.98, 0.72-1.33). Poorer perceived health was greatest if