The attributive versus final distinction and the manifestation of “main clause phenomena” in Japanese and Korean noun modifying clause constructions
The attributive versus final distinction and the manifestation of “main clause phenomena” in Japanese and Korean noun modifying clause constructions
复制标题
日韩名词修饰从句结构中定语与结尾的区别及“主句现象”的表现
DOI：
10.1075/tsl.116.03hor
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Horie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Horie
本文比较了日语和韩语的名词修饰从句结构对“主要从句现象”的适应程度。具体来说，日语的nmcc允许出现称呼礼貌的后缀，并允许引用的话语用最少的连接设备来表达。这些主要的条款现象在韩国的nmcc中是不允许的。我们认为，日语NMCCs对主句现象的容忍度高于韩语NMCCs，这与两种语言之间显著的形态句法差异至关重要，即日语NMCCs对定语和句末形式的区分实际上不存在（日语），而韩语NMCCs对定语和句末形式的区分则系统存在（韩语）。日语中定语和词尾的区别在16世纪左右消失了。
This paper compares Japanese and Korean noun-modifying clause constructions (NMCCs) in terms of the extent to which they accommodate ‘main clause phenomena’. Specifically, Japanese NMCCs allow for address-politeness suffixes to occur, and for quoted speech to be manifested with minimal linking devices. These main clause phenomena are disallowed within Korean NMCCs. We argue that the greater tolerance toward main clause phenomena in Japanese NMCCs than in Korean counterparts is crucially related to a prominent morpho-syntactic difference between the two languages, i.e. the virtual absence (Japanese) versus systematic presence (Korean) of the distinction between attributive and sentence-final forms. The attributive-final distinction in Japanese was obliterated around the sixteenth century.