The Discovery of Irish Folklore
The Discovery of Irish Folklore
复制标题
爱尔兰民间传说的发现
DOI:
10.1353/nhr.2006.0069
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Anne Markey
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Anne Markey
Anyone interested in Irish literature, whether in the Irish or the English lan guage, will be familiar with the concept of folklore. For those whose knowledge is confined to works in the English language, the concept often remains nebu lous because the collection, study, and discussion of Irish folklore during the twentieth century have largely been undertaken through the medium of Irish. The resultant system of academic specialization has led to a persistent tenden cy, among critics and other commentators, to occlude the relationship between Irish folklore and Irish writing in English?though during the latter half of the twentieth century a few significant studies have investigated continuities between the Gaelic tradition, associated with Irish folklore, and the Anglo-Irish literary tradition.1 Nevertheless, within and outside academic circles, many remain confused about what constitutes Irish folklore, and what its relationship is, or should be, to literature. Although the concept was already familiar to antiquaries interested in pop ular traditions and to an English-speaking reading public that had been intro duced to Edgar Taylor's translation of Grimms' Kinder-und Hausm?rchen in 1823, the term "folklore" was not coined until 1846 when the English antiquary William John Thorns, under the pseudonym Ambrose Merton, first used the term in a letter published in the English periodical, The Athenaeum. In an effort to align English scholarship with the work of the Brothers Grimm in Germany, Thorns proposed "a good Saxon compound, Folk-Lore?the Lore of the People" to denote "the manners, customs observances, superstitions, ballads, proverbs, &c of the olden time." Lamenting the loss of much such material, Thorns sought aid "in garnering the few ears which are remaining, scattered over that field from which our forefathers might have gathered a goodly crop."2 The letter raises