Japan in Asia: Post-cold-war diplomacy
Japan in Asia: Post-cold-war diplomacy
复制标题
日本在亚洲：冷战后外交
DOI：
10.1080/18692729.2018.1449409
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
André Asplund
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
André Asplund
《日本在亚洲：冷战后的外交》是田中明彦 2007 年新出版的《Aji no naka no Nihon》的英文版。田中通过这本书的 11 个通俗易懂的章节，面向广大读者，引导读者了解从冷战至今东亚最突出的政治和经济事件的转变，让读者了解日本的外交努力和野心。从1975年西贡的陷落和日本立即向统一的越南提供发展援助开始，到对天安门事件的有点不情愿的批评反应，再到与中国、朝鲜和韩国等近邻时断时续的关系，这本书讲述了一个国家试图通过建立桥梁——实际上是通过对外援助，象征性地是通过促进亚洲的区域主义——在国际政治中找到自己的位置的故事。虽然这本书将日本与盟友和对手的外交和政治交往、对当代亚洲历史事件的行动和反应联系起来，但它也描绘了一个试图在世界上找到自己的位置并满足国际社会要求的国家的图景，一个在追求身份认同中苦苦挣扎的国家，一个在中国和韩国等其他亚洲国家眼中未能妥善处理和处理其战争时期历史的国家。该书的主要论点，虽然没有明确说明，是日本多年来与其他国家的接触1977 年福田政府的政策开始日益重视日本与东南亚国家之间的“心连心”理解，这一政策最终开始带来红利，并在亚洲邻国中产生了对日本的总体积极看法，其中许多国家都经历了日本战时的侵略和占领。从字里行间可以看出，这些“接触”通常被拼写为 ODA（官方发展援助，或简称为外国援助）。尽管现任安倍晋三政府有自己的章节，但令人惊讶的是，很少有人关注ODA在东南亚的当代使用及其潜在的新含义：自安倍重新掌权以来，《国家安全战略》和《发展合作宪章》都强调了如何在未来更具战略性地利用ODA，并将其用于日本自身的安全（例如，Yamamoto，2017）。在这里，考虑到田中曾担任过日本国际协力机构（JICA）主席，因此想必能够对与政府高层打交道获得广泛的见解，因此这本书并没有真正就日本自身的战略利益（特别是针对像中国这样的新兴援助大国）在该地区使用日本援助提出问题。
Japan in Asia: post-cold-war diplomacy is a newly published English version of Akihiko TanakaLs Aji no naka no Nihon from 2007. Through the bookLs 11 accessibly written chapters Tanaka targets a wide audience and offers a glimpse into JapanLs diplomatic efforts and ambitions as he guides the reader through the most prominent political and economic turn of events in East Asia from the Cold War until today. Starting with the fall of Saigon in 1975 and JapanLs immediate provision of development assistance to a unified Vietnam, the somewhat reluctantly critical reaction to the Tiananmen Square incident, and onwards to the onand-off relationships with its immediate neighbors-China, North and South Korea-the book tells a tale of a country trying to find its place in international politics by building bridges-literally through foreign aid, and figuratively through promoting regionalism in Asia. While the book links Japanese diplomatic and political dealings with allies and adversaries, actions and reactions to events of contemporary Asian history, it also paints a picture of a country trying to find its place in the world and live up to the demands of the international community, a nation struggling in its pursuit of identity, and one which in the eyes of other Asian nations like China and South Korea is failing to properly address and deal with its war-time past.The bookLs main argument, although not explicitly provided as such, is that years of Japanese contacts with the rest of Asia-from the policies of the Fukuda administration in 1977, which would come to attach increased importance to the need for Lheart-toheart understandingsL between Japan and the Southeast Asian nations-has finally started to pay dividends and generated an overall positive view of Japan among its Asian neighbors, many of which experienced Japanese war-time aggression and occupation. Between the lines, it is clear that these LcontactsL have more often than not been spelled ODA (Official Development Assistance, or simply foreign aid). And although the incumbent Shinzo Abe administration is given its own chapter, astonishingly little attention is being directed toward the contemporary use of ODA in Southeast Asia, and its potential new meanings: since AbeLs return to power, the National Security Strategy as well as the Development Cooperation Charter has highlighted how ODA will be utilized even more strategically in the future, and used for JapanLs own security (eg, Yamamoto, 2017). Here, given that Tanaka has served as the president of JICA (the Japanese International Cooperation Agency) and as such presumably has been able to acquire extensive insights into the dealings with the higher echelons of governments, the book does not really problematize the use of Japanese aid in the region with regard to JapanLs own strategic interests-particularly vis-á-vis a burgeoning aid power like China.