Concept mapping methodology and community-engaged research: A perfect pairing
Concept mapping methodology and community-engaged research: A perfect pairing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013
复制
发表时间：
2017-02-01
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Burke, Jessica G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vaughn, Lisa M.;Jones, Jennifer R.;Burke, Jessica G.
Trochim等人改进的概念图方法是唯一适合于让社区参与从项目设置到数据收集到结果解释到结果传播的研究的各个方面的方法，并且越来越多的研究利用该方法来探索社区中的复杂健康问题。在目前的手稿中，我们提出了在健康相关的研究中，概念图与社区合作使用的同行评议文章的文献检索结果。共有103篇文章符合纳入标准。我们首先解决如何在文章中定义社区参与，然后集中在文章中描述高社区参与和相关的社区成果/好处和方法的挑战。多数（61%）; n = 63）的文章被归类为低至中度社区参与和参与，而38%（n = 39）的文章被归类为高社区参与和参与。这篇文献综述的结果增强了我们对概念图如何与社区直接合作的理解，并突出了研究人员和社区的许多潜在好处。(C)2016爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Concept mapping methodology as refined by Trochim et al. is uniquely suited to engage communities in all aspects of research from project set-up to data collection to interpreting results to dissemination of results, and an increasing number of research studies have utilized the methodology for exploring complex health issues in communities. In the current manuscript, we present the results of a literature search of peer-reviewed articles in health-related research where concept mapping was used in collaboration with the community. A total of 103 articles met the inclusion criteria. We first address how community engagement was defined in the articles and then focus on the articles describing high community engagement and the associated community outcomes/benefits and methodological challenges. A majority (61%; n=63) of the articles were classified as low to moderate community engagement and participation while 38% (n=39) of the articles were classified as high community engagement and participation. The results of this literature review enhance our understanding of how concept mapping can be used in direct collaboration with communities and highlights the many potential benefits for both researchers, and communities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.