Bentham’s Sanction Typology and Restrictive Deterrence

Bentham’s Sanction Typology and Restrictive Deterrence
复制标题

边沁的制裁类型与限制性威慑

DOI:
10.1177/0022042613497936
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Andrea Allen
Andrea Allen
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scott Jacques;Andrea Allen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

限制性威慑是指犯罪者限制其犯罪的频率、程度或严重性以避免痛苦的过程。以往关于毒品交易和限制性威慑的研究主要集中在正式控制或政治制裁的影响上。然而,边沁认为还有四种其他类型的制裁可以阻止犯罪:道德,同情,宗教和身体。本文探讨了是否以及如何每种制裁类型的样本中的29个年轻,郊区,中产阶级的毒品销售商限制毒品销售。最后,我们讨论的制裁之间的相互联系,并概述了选择边沁的制裁类型学在未来的工作中的原因研究的有用性。
Restrictive deterrence is the process whereby offenders limit the frequency, magnitude, or seriousness of their offenses to avoid pain. Prior research on drug dealing and restrictive deterrence largely focuses on the effect of formal control, or political sanction. Bentham, however, suggests there are four other types of sanction that may deter offenses: moral, sympathetic, religious, and physical. This paper explores whether and how each sanction type restricts drug sales among a sample of 29 young, suburban, middle-class drug sellers. We conclude by discussing the usefulness of studying interconnections between the sanctions and by outlining the reasons to choose Bentham’s sanction typology in future work.