Structure of the beta 2 homodimer of bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi: X-ray analysis of a kinetic protein folding trap.
Structure of the beta 2 homodimer of bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi: X-ray analysis of a kinetic protein folding trap.
复制标题
哈维氏弧菌细菌荧光素酶 β2 同二聚体的结构:动力学蛋白质折叠陷阱的 X 射线分析。
DOI:
10.1002/pro.5560060103
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rayment,I
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thoden,JB;Holden,HM;Fisher,AJ;Sinclair,JF;Wesenberg,G;Baldwin,TO;Rayment,I
Luciferase, as isolated fromVibrio harveyi, is anaβheterodimer. When allowed to fold in the absence of the α subunit, either in vitro or in vivo, the β subunit of the enzyme will form a kinetically stable homodimer that does not unfold even after prolonged incubation in 5 M urea at pH 7.0 and 18 °C. This form of the β subunit, arising via kinetic partitioning on the folding pathway, appears to constitute a kinetically trapped alternative to the heterodimeric enzyme (Sinclair JF, Ziegler MM, Baldwin TO. 1994. Kinetic partitioning during protein folding yields multiple native states.Nature Struct Biol 1: 320–326). Here we describe the X‐ray crystal structure of theβ2homodimer of luciferase fromV. harveyidetermined and refined at 1.95 Å resolution. Crystals employed in the investigation belonged to the orthorhombic space group P212121with unit cell dimensions ofa =58.8 Å,b= 62.0 Å, andc= 218.2 Å and contained one dimer per asymmetric unit. Like that observed in the functional luciferaseαβheterodimer, the major tertiary structural motif of each β subunit consists of an (α/β)8barrel (Fisher AJ, Raushel FM, Baldwin TO, Rayment I. 1995. Three‐dimensional structure of bacterial luciferase fromVibrio harveyiat 2.4 Å resolution.Biochemistry 34: 6581–6586). The root‐mean‐square deviation of the α‐carbon coordinates between the β subunits of the hetero‐ and homodimers is 0.7 Å. This high resolution X‐ray analysis demonstrates that “domain” or “loop” swapping has not occurred upon formation of theβ2homodimer and thus the stability of the β2species to denaturation cannot be explained in such simple terms. In fact, the subunit:subunit interfaces observed in both theβ2homodimer andαβheterodimer are remarkably similar in hydrogen‐bonding patterns and buried surface areas.