Move Analysis of the Conclusion Sections of Research Papers in Persian and English.
Move Analysis of the Conclusion Sections of Research Papers in Persian and English.
复制标题
波斯语和英语研究论文结论部分的移动分析。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Saman Ebadi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Zamani;Saman Ebadi
学术论文结论部分的结构对学术写作具有重要意义。结论部分，尽管提供了一个大纲的文章，国家的其他重要组成部分，如建议，影响和未来研究的可能路线的声明。本文分析了国际期刊上发表的波斯语和英语研究论文的结论部分。为此，从土木工程和应用语言学两个领域选择了20个RP。论文的结论部分根据Yang和Allison（2003）的移动模型进行了检查。的频率分析的动作之间的细微差异和卡方检验方面，应用语言学和土木工程RP的结论部分之间没有观察到显着差异，以及波斯语和英语RP之间的移动。本研究对学术论文的结论结构有了更丰富的理解，并为ESP/EFL教师和研究者提供了可用于指导学术写作的惯例或期望的见解。对于新手作家和非母语学生来说，它可以帮助他们摆脱写作困境，并帮助他们参与国际话语社区。
The structure of the conclusion sections in Research Papers (RPs) is of significance in academic writing. The conclusion section in spite of providing an outline of the article, states other essential components, such as recommendations, implications and statements of possible lines of future research. This paper analyses the conclusion parts of Persian and English Research papers published in international journals. To meet this end 20 RPs were selected from two fields including Civil Engineering and Applied Linguistics. The Conclusion sections of the papers were examined for their moves based on Yang and Allison’s (2003) model of moves. The frequency analysis of the moves showed slight differences among the moves employed and with regards to the Chi-Square tests, no significant differences were observed between the Conclusion sections of Applied Linguistics and Civil Engineering RPs regarding the moves employed as well as between Persian and English RPs. The study yields a richer understanding of the conclusion structure of research articles and offers ESP/EFL instructors and researchers, insights which can be used in the instruction of the conventions or expectations of academic writing. Novice writers and non-native students can benefit from it, mainly because it helps them eliminate their writing dilemmas and assists them to take part in international discourse communities.