OPTIMAL CORRECTION OF ACIDOSIS CHANGES PROGRESSION OF DIALYSIS OSTEODYSTROPHY
OPTIMAL CORRECTION OF ACIDOSIS CHANGES PROGRESSION OF DIALYSIS OSTEODYSTROPHY
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/ki.1989.309
复制
发表时间:
1989-12-01
影响因子:
19.6
通讯作者:
MORIEUX, C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
LEFEBVRE, A;DEVERNEJOUL, MC;MORIEUX, C
To investigate an eventual role of acidosis on hemodialysis osteodystrophy we prospectively studied 21 patients who were dialyzed with different amounts of bicarbonate in the dialysate for 18 months. According to the level of bone formation rate (BFR) on a prestudy bone biopsy, patients were split in two subgroups. Inside these two subgroups patients were randomly allocated to two therapeutics groups: 10 patients (group A) were dialyzed with the conventional amount of bicarbonate (33 .+-. 2 mmol/liter) in the dialysate; the rest of the patients (group B, N = 11) had 7 to 15 mmol/liter sodium bicarbonate added to the dialysate to obtain 24 mEq predialysis bicarbonate plasma levels. An effective correction of acidosis was shown in group B by a higher predialysis plasma bicarbonate level (15.6 .+-. 1 group A vs. 24.0 .+-. 0.6 mEq/liter group B, P < 0.005), which was reached three months after start of the study. Compared to the prestudy bone biopsy, osteoid and osteoblastic surfaces increased in group A but not in group B on the bone biopsies performed at the end of the study. Parathormone plasma level (iPTH), measured with an antiserum which cross reacts with the 44.68 region of PTH molecule, increased during the study in group A but not in group B. This findings suggested progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) only in group A patients. Osteocalcin plasma values increased in both groups during the 18 months of the study. Consequently the two subgroups of patients formed on the basis of BFR level were evaluated separately. The subgroup of patients with normal-high BFR on the prestudy bone biopsy had a high bone resorption and elevated iPTH and osteocalcin plasma levels at start of the study. In this subgroup of patients with osteocalcin plasma level increased more in group A than in group B during the study. The subgroup of patients with normal-low BFR had lower osteocalcin levels, and seven of ten patients had aplastic bone disease at start of the study. In this subgroup, osteocalcin plasma values were unchanged during the study in group A but increased in group B. There was no significant modification of plasma or bone aluminium in any group during the time of the study. Therefore, an optimal correction of acidosis could decrease progression of HPT in patients with high bone turnover, and stimulate bone turnover in patients with low bone formation.